2015
DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2014.946576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tourist Perceptions of Event–Sponsor Brand Fit and Sponsor Brand Attitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of RQ2 revealed that the new method has been the predominant measurement method in empirical tourism research applying SC theory. On the other hand, there are numerous studies which were published after the 2010s in top-tier journals using the traditional method (Boksberger et al, 2011;Kastenholz, 2010;Khoo-Lattimore & Prayag, 2016;Hung & Petrick, 2011;Shu et al, 2015;Xu & Pratt, 2018), although Sirgy et al (1997) and Sirgy and Su (2000) proposed that the traditional method has three key problems (the use of discrepancy scores, predetermined images and a compensatory decision rule). Thus, it is believed that comparative research should further re-explore the advantages and disadvantages of these methods within the context of tourism.…”
Section: Journal Of Travel and Tourism Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of RQ2 revealed that the new method has been the predominant measurement method in empirical tourism research applying SC theory. On the other hand, there are numerous studies which were published after the 2010s in top-tier journals using the traditional method (Boksberger et al, 2011;Kastenholz, 2010;Khoo-Lattimore & Prayag, 2016;Hung & Petrick, 2011;Shu et al, 2015;Xu & Pratt, 2018), although Sirgy et al (1997) and Sirgy and Su (2000) proposed that the traditional method has three key problems (the use of discrepancy scores, predetermined images and a compensatory decision rule). Thus, it is believed that comparative research should further re-explore the advantages and disadvantages of these methods within the context of tourism.…”
Section: Journal Of Travel and Tourism Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sponsored organizations, causes, events or individuals) is important for predicting sponsorship effects. Studies have provided evidence that sponsor–property fit is one of the key factors stimulating sponsor recall (Grohs et al ., 2004; Han et al ., 2013) and brand favorability (Han et al ., 2013; Shu et al ., 2015), as well as likelihood to buy from sponsors (Han et al , 2013). Therefore, consumers who perceive the brand–event image fit of sponsorships as congruent are likely to have more positive cognitive and affective responses to the brands in question.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruiting procedures based on the assessment of knowledge, skills and work experience have been proven to be more successful when supplementing them with measures testing and validating congruence between individual values and the organization's value system (Arthur et al 2006;Morley 2007). A concept that has been derived from the person-organization fit, but with a broader and more inclusive scope, is the concept of person-brand fit (Hurrell and Scholarios 2014;Matzler et al 2011;Shu, King, and Chang 2015). However, in the departmental context, it can be likewise understood as the processes designed to enable the judgement of compatibility between individual values and organizational values, and the measures to encourage alignment between employees and the cultural value system of the organization (Holt 2003;Schneider, Goldstein, and Smith 1995).…”
Section: Selecting Staff Showing a High Person-brand Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%