2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a comprehensive understanding of effect of cation distribution and M2+ constituent in spinel ferrite nanocrystals MFe2O4 (M = Co, Mn, and Ni) on the electrochemical response in sensitive detection of chloramphenicol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the linear relationships between the peak current intensity against the square root of the scan rate (ν 1/2 ) were found, revealing the reversible redox reaction of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3−/4− probes occurring at the electrode-electrolyte interface was a diffusion controlled process. From that, the electrochemical active areas (A) of these electrodes were calculated by using the Randles-Ševčík equation as follows (25 °C): 11,34 This result was consistent with the results observed from physical characterizations when MnO 2 nanosheet-Ag possessed a unique nanocomposite structure with synergic effects coming from the uniform distribution of AgNPs on the MnO 2 nanosheet surfaces. In this case, MnO 2 nanosheets acted as an effective conductive matrix possessing ultrathin thickness, small diffusion ion length, good structural flexibility, and high active area as well as other unique physicochemical properties including better electrical conductivity, and chemical stability, while, the strong active AgNPs were decored effectively on this matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the linear relationships between the peak current intensity against the square root of the scan rate (ν 1/2 ) were found, revealing the reversible redox reaction of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3−/4− probes occurring at the electrode-electrolyte interface was a diffusion controlled process. From that, the electrochemical active areas (A) of these electrodes were calculated by using the Randles-Ševčík equation as follows (25 °C): 11,34 This result was consistent with the results observed from physical characterizations when MnO 2 nanosheet-Ag possessed a unique nanocomposite structure with synergic effects coming from the uniform distribution of AgNPs on the MnO 2 nanosheet surfaces. In this case, MnO 2 nanosheets acted as an effective conductive matrix possessing ultrathin thickness, small diffusion ion length, good structural flexibility, and high active area as well as other unique physicochemical properties including better electrical conductivity, and chemical stability, while, the strong active AgNPs were decored effectively on this matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…6a′-6c′), confirming that the electrode reaction is an adsorption-controlled process nature rather than diffusion process. 43 According to that, the adsorption capacity of 4-NP (Г) on the modified electrode surfaces was also determined through the equation 11,42 (I p = n 2 F 2 AГν/4RT) at around 6.42 × 10 -11 , 7.56 × 10 -11 , and 8.22 × 10 -11 mol cm −2 for MnO 2 rods-Ag/SPE, MnO 2 wires-Ag/SPE, and MnO 2 sheets-Ag/SPE, respectively. Besides, the redox peak potential shift of 4-NP was positive according to a linear relationship with ln(ν), corresponding to the linear regression equations: Based on the Laviron equation 40,41,44 for the surface-controlled transfer model:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the electrochemical active area (A) was determined using the Randles-Sevcik equation at the room conditions (25 °C). [27][28][29][30] The equation is given by: 31 I p (μA) = 2.69 × 10 5 n 3/2 AD 1/2 ν 1/2 C; where n = 1 (the number of electrons transferred in redox reaction of Fe(CN) 6 3−/4 ), D = 6.5 × 10 -6 (diffusion coefficient-cm 2 s −1 ), C is bulk concentration of Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− . According to that, then calculated electrochemical active area (A) was approximately 0.146 cm 2 for the unmodified electrode (bare SPE) and 0.184, 0.186, and 0.186 cm 2 for the modified electrodes (ZIF-8/SPE, Ag@ZIF-8/SPE, and Au@ZIF-8/ SPE), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%