2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a discourse shift in social gerontology: From successful aging to harmonious aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
128
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These calls have argued that the distinction between successful and unsuccessful agers follows an ageist worldview, as "successful" old age is seen as a continuation of middle age and avoidance of all illness and deterioration (Calasanti 2015;Dillaway and Byrnes 2009;Liang and Luo 2012). Furthermore, the paradigm in these theories reflects Western values of independence and productivity and fails to address values of intergenerational solidarity or harmonization that may be of greater relevance for defining desirable old age for some groups of older adults (Lamb 2014;Liang and Luo 2012). A similar criticism is directed toward the distinction between the third (e.g., successful ageing) and the fourth age (e.g., failed old age), as the fourth age is perceived as the "real old age" and includes all negative attitudes of society toward this age group (Higgs and Gilleard 2014).…”
Section: Short-term and Long-term Strategies For Coping With Self-ageismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calls have argued that the distinction between successful and unsuccessful agers follows an ageist worldview, as "successful" old age is seen as a continuation of middle age and avoidance of all illness and deterioration (Calasanti 2015;Dillaway and Byrnes 2009;Liang and Luo 2012). Furthermore, the paradigm in these theories reflects Western values of independence and productivity and fails to address values of intergenerational solidarity or harmonization that may be of greater relevance for defining desirable old age for some groups of older adults (Lamb 2014;Liang and Luo 2012). A similar criticism is directed toward the distinction between the third (e.g., successful ageing) and the fourth age (e.g., failed old age), as the fourth age is perceived as the "real old age" and includes all negative attitudes of society toward this age group (Higgs and Gilleard 2014).…”
Section: Short-term and Long-term Strategies For Coping With Self-ageismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is in line with newly emerged ways of thinking about old age. For example, Liang and Luo (2012) write about holistic approaches to ageing that bring forward fresh perspectives for understanding ageing and changing lives in old age. Sandberg's (2013) concept of affirmative old age, built around the concept of diversity, provides another venue for reconsidering and combating negative and one-sided accounts of ageing.…”
Section: Affective Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been strong appeals for developing culture-specific measurement for successful ageing (e.g. Lewis 2010;Liang and Luo 2012), to date, there are no established definitions and measurements of culture-specific successful ageing for the non-western countries in current literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%