Toward a dynamic model of Gelotophobia: Social support, workplace bullying and stress are connected with diverging trajectories of life and job satisfaction among Gelotophobes

Abstract

Recent theoretical advances have grounded gelotophobia (Greek: gelos = laughter, phobos = fear) in a dynamic framework of causes, moderating factors, and consequences of the fear of being laughed at. This understanding corresponds to that of vulnerability and translates gelotophobia into a distinguishable pattern of lacking resources (i.e., misinterpretation of joy and laughter) that can result in negative consequences (e.g., reduced well-being and performance) if individuals have no access to further resources (e.g., social support) or are exposed to severe stressors (e.g., workplace bullying). Based on the panel data provided by the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES (N = 2469 across six measurement intervals), this study takes the first step toward empirically testing this model’s assumptions: First, we computed exemplary zero-order correlations and showed that gelotophobia was negatively connected with social support (resource) and life and job satisfaction (consequences) and positively connected with perceived stress, work stress, and workplace bullying (stressors). Second, we used longitudinal cluster analyses (KmL; k-means-longitudinal) and showed that the panel data can be clustered into three stable patterns of life and job satisfaction and that gelotophobia is primarily related to the two clusters marked by lower levels of satisfaction. Third, we computed partial correlations and showed that social support, perceived stress, and work stress (but not workplace bullying) can weaken or completely resolve gelotophobia’s relationships with such diverging trajectories of life and job satisfaction. We concluded that seeing gelotophobia through the lens of vulnerability is useful and that such research warrants further attention using more dedicated, theoretically grounded projects.

Analysis of Individual Performance through Job Satisfaction: A Study of Faculty Members in Public Sector Universities in Sindh, Pakistan

“…there is a correlation among some indicators it means, there can be one factor for each correlating indicator. The exploratory factor analysis can be processed further where at least one factor exists (Ruch & Stahlmann, 2020). Bartlett's test suggests some questions are highly correlated with each other.…”

“…There are varieties of determinants that have been highlighted in different studies that affect faculty job satisfaction (Ismayilova& Klassen, 2019;Bäker& Goodall, 2020;Ashraf, 2020). 137 criteria, job insecurity, and non-competitive salary packages have adverse effects on job satisfaction (Muri et al, 2020;Ruch & Stahlmann, 2020;Kraft et al, 2020).…”

“…The ANOVA table indicates whether the hypothesis is predictive or inaccurate. Following the (Muri et al, 2020;Ruch & Stahlmann, 2020) suggestions, if an F-value exceeds 4 or the probability value is 0.05, the framework is useful;…”

Social Intervention and Governance of Youth School Bullying—Based on Computer Medical Data Analysis

“…Bullying is a behavior that continuously harms others. Due to the imbalance of social and physical and mental strength between the victim and the abuser, the victim suffers long-term and continuous harm in the process of bullying ( 1 , 2 ).…”

“…In terms of school bullying ( 2 ), stated that bullying means that “in the same group, the powerful party uses words and behaviors to intentionally bring physical and mental stress and harm to the vulnerable group members”. Japan's education ministry in the early 1990s defined bullying as “unilateral, sustained physical and mental attacks that can cause great pain to others”.…”