2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30481-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Formal Common Information Model Ontology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several publications exist that attempt to create a conversion of CIM to OWL. In [6] the authors compare possible conversions of CIM to RDFS (Resource Description Framework Schema) and to OWL. They find that RDFS is unsuitable to express CIM as it "does not provide constructs for expressing cardinality restrictions such as those used for describing association or aggregation relationships between CIM classes".…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several publications exist that attempt to create a conversion of CIM to OWL. In [6] the authors compare possible conversions of CIM to RDFS (Resource Description Framework Schema) and to OWL. They find that RDFS is unsuitable to express CIM as it "does not provide constructs for expressing cardinality restrictions such as those used for describing association or aggregation relationships between CIM classes".…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow for semantic interoperability in IT management, a corresponding management ontology is required, and in [5], CIM has been proposed for this purpose. As [6] points out, CIM is usable for inferring properties about distributed systems, but is a semi-formal ontology with limited support for knowledge interoperability and aggregation, as well as reasoning. To create an IT management domain model that overcomes these shortcomings, a conversion of CIM to OWL is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information becomes stored in the Jena Semantic Web Framework [13]. Now, by using an extended version of an existing CIM ontology [9], further knowledge about the system (e.g. different types of interdependencies) can be inferred and queried via well-defined SPARQL queries.…”
Section: Realization -The I2map Browsermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key differentiator between our approach and the traditional AN approaches is that while we rely on tags in the packet stream, it is the router (using its specified policies) that controls how the packet is handled and not the other way. [10], [3] are relevant work directed at development of formal ontologies and tools to facilitate network management and control. In this paper, we present our architecture for realizing intelligent policy based networks.…”
Section: Simulation Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%