Rule explosion related to an increase in the number of input variables has been recognised as a key issue in fuzzy logic systems (FLSs), and hierarchical fuzzy systems (HFSs) have been proposed as a viable solution. The typical FLS subsystem system is transformed into a low-dimensional FLS subsystem network in HFS. Furthermore, because the number of input variables in each subsystem is reduced, the rules in HFS generally contain antecedents with fewer variables than the rules in regular FLS with similar functions. As a result, HFSs can reduce rule explosion, reducing model complexity and improving model interpretability. Nonetheless, the concerns concerning the issue of "Does reducing the complexity of HFSs with various subsystems, layers, and diverse topologies actually increase their interpretability?" remain unclear. In this study, we compare two HFS topologies: parallel and serial, concentrating on interpretability and complexity. For both topologies, a full measurement of the interpretability and complexity with various configurations is presented. The goal of this comparative study is to see if there is a correlation between HFS interpretability and complexity.