1992
DOI: 10.1177/002224299205600107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality

Abstract: The author develops a theory of competitive rationality that proposes a firm's success depends on the imperfect procedural rationality of its marketing planners. Theories of economic psychology and information economics are integrated with the Austrian economic school of thought and with marketing management concepts and scholarship. Implications for managers and scholars are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
339
3
24

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
18
339
3
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Intangible resources, such as knowledge and skills, are the cornerstones of the firm's ability to orchestrate a value proposition. That is, the firm uses its knowledge and skills to understand and meet customer needs in a manner that is superior to competitors' (Dickson, 1992). In order for this process to take place, customers must be involved, first because value only emerges when a customer's need is satisfied (Woodruff, 1997) and second because a customer's knowledge enables the superior satisfaction of such needs-as the recent trends toward open innovation attest (Chesbrough & Appleyard, 2007).…”
Section: Service-dominant Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intangible resources, such as knowledge and skills, are the cornerstones of the firm's ability to orchestrate a value proposition. That is, the firm uses its knowledge and skills to understand and meet customer needs in a manner that is superior to competitors' (Dickson, 1992). In order for this process to take place, customers must be involved, first because value only emerges when a customer's need is satisfied (Woodruff, 1997) and second because a customer's knowledge enables the superior satisfaction of such needs-as the recent trends toward open innovation attest (Chesbrough & Appleyard, 2007).…”
Section: Service-dominant Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDL perspective points to the centrality of the firm's intangible resources and the role of the customer in value co-creation, indicating how customer knowledge is instrumental to the orchestration of the firm's value propositions (Dickson, 1992;Vargo & Lusch, 2004). Along these lines, recent work demonstrates that firms working with incomplete customer data and imprecise metrics for evaluating them run the risk of alienating, rather than satisfying, customers (Boulding, Staelin, Ehret, & Johnston, 2005) and, as consequence, experiencing lower profitability (Ryals, 2005).…”
Section: Customer-managed Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above objective function explicitly incorporates the need to balance the requirements of a diverse customer base (as reflected by the numerator, which is an aggregation of perceived interaction value across different customers) against the firm's requirement to control the investment of resources (as reflected by the denominator). Since NCSS interaction value is based on customers' perceptions, its magnitude changes over time as competition runs its course and customers' expectations and perceptions change (Dickson, 1992).…”
Section: Ncss Interaction Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…new ways of serving customers. As new approaches are identified, effective innovations are imitated and the impetus for further innovation is created (Dickson, 1992). Guided by these theoretical perspectives, and using our taxonomy as the basis for Web site analysis, we analyzed data from field interviews and Web sites of leading service companies to surface the stable rules underlying the development of Web site functionality, and to identify the specific stages of the model.…”
Section: New Products and Services Procedural Efficiency Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade organizational learning has been established as an important capability for achieving competitive advantage. Indeed, some consider the ability to learn faster than competitors to be the only source of sustainable competitive advantage (DeGeus, 1988;Dickson, 1992;Slater & Narver, 1995). One area of study within the organizational learning research stream focuses specifically on the organization's existing knowledge base, sometimes referred to as "memory level" (Moorman & Miner, 1997), and its influence on organizational adaptation abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%