Toward a holistic networks approach to strategic third-party intervention: A literature review

Abstract

How do third parties decide to intervene in civil conflicts? The study of intervention has focused primarily on the conflict characteristics and dyadic linkages that make intervention more likely, or the conflict outcomes that interventions generate, while holding all else equal. To paint a more complete picture of what goes into the intervention decision, I advocate a shift in the way we conceive of interventions toward network analysis, which grants due agency to the multiple external actors and internal combatants that influence the decision to intervene. This review critically examines and synthesizes the recent literature on third-party interventions in civil conflict and, in so doing, identifies some areas for future research.

Do International Interventions Prolong Civil Conflicts? The Effect of Ex Ante Expectations

“…While there is a general consensus within the literature that UN peacekeeping and mediation by third parties are appropriate strategies for managing civil conflicts, it is widely accepted that unilateral military or economic intervention is generally not an effective conflict mitigation tool (Hannigan, 2019;Hegre et al, 2019). Literature published in the 1990s has demonstrated the positive effect of external intervention, which can influence the antagonists' strategies and shorten the duration of the war (Carment & Rowlands, 1998;Licklider, 1993Licklider, , 1995.…”