2012
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a loss of functional diversity in stream fish assemblages under climate change

Abstract: The assessment of climate change impacts on biodiversity has so far been biased toward the taxonomic identification of the species likely either to benefit from climate modifications or to experience overall declines. There have still been few studies intended to correlate the characteristics of species to their sensitivity to climate change, even though it is now recognized that functional trait-based approaches are promising tools for addressing challenges related to global changes. In this study, two functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
159
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
159
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…At the local scale, functional distinctiveness takes into account all species within the community to measure whether species i is more or less functionally close to the rest of the community [40]. At the regional scale, functional uniqueness relies on the functionally nearest species to measure the extent to which species i has no functional equivalent (or redundancy) in the pool [90]. These two indices simply correspond to the Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD) and the Mean Nearest Taxon Distance (MNTD) measuring the isolation (based on phylogenetic relationships) of each species from all the others and to its closest relative, respectively [91].…”
Section: Box 2 Measuring Functional Distinctiveness and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the local scale, functional distinctiveness takes into account all species within the community to measure whether species i is more or less functionally close to the rest of the community [40]. At the regional scale, functional uniqueness relies on the functionally nearest species to measure the extent to which species i has no functional equivalent (or redundancy) in the pool [90]. These two indices simply correspond to the Mean Pairwise Distance (MPD) and the Mean Nearest Taxon Distance (MNTD) measuring the isolation (based on phylogenetic relationships) of each species from all the others and to its closest relative, respectively [91].…”
Section: Box 2 Measuring Functional Distinctiveness and Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mammals and birds in seed-dispersal networks or several vertebrate and invertebrate taxa in pollination networks) [49][50][51]. Analyses of functional diversity calculated from morphological traits have therefore been restricted to analyses within a single taxon [5,16,33,39,52]. If species from different taxa fulfil similar, converging functional roles in different regions, then this might result in incomplete and misleading patterns of functional diversity.…”
Section: (C) Analyses Of Functional Diversity Across Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial body of research has also focused on understanding the relationships between functional traits and community compositional change along environmental gradients (Diaz et al 1998, Weiher et al 1998, Thuiller et al 2004, Shipley et al 2006, Suding et al 2008, Cornwell and Ackerly 2009, Laughlin et al 2012 A relatively small number of studies have attempted to meet this challenge by predicting concomitant change in biodiversity outcomes and ecosystem functioning under climate change scenarios. A simple approach to achieving this objective has been to link projected changes in the distributions of individual species with information on the functional attributes of those species, to inform potential changes in the functional composition and diversity of the assemblages obtained when the species-level predictions are ''stacked'' (Thuiller et al 2006, Buisson et al 2013, Gallagher et al 2013, Terrier et al 2013). Alternatively, current community-level functional attributes have been modeled in response to key environmental variables and projected into the future (Dubuis et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%