2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00643.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Model of Organizational Co‐Evolution in Transition Economies

Abstract: The paper presents a model of organization-environment co-evolution, which portrays the joint impact of organizational and environmental characteristics on organizational survival. The four organizational characteristics included in the model are: (a) control structure, (b) product strategy, (c) exchange strategy, and (d) distance to the market. The three environmental characteristics are: (a) control structures, (b) competitive structures, and (c) exchange structures. In line with the general co-evolutionary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We further argued that these three phases of internationalization are closely aligned and co-evolve (Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010;Suhomlinova, 2006) with the phases of institutional transition in emerging markets: pre-liberalization, after liberalization (but before industry deregulation), and after industry deregulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We further argued that these three phases of internationalization are closely aligned and co-evolve (Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010;Suhomlinova, 2006) with the phases of institutional transition in emerging markets: pre-liberalization, after liberalization (but before industry deregulation), and after industry deregulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, Van Den Ende, Wijinberg, Vogels, and Kerstens (2003) found the coevolution phenomenon to exist between the way firms organize their innovative activities and the dynamics of markets, especially those having bandwagon or network effects. Others have studied the co-evolution approach in sustainable development (Rammel, McIntosh, & Jeffrey, 2007), in transition economies (Suhomlinova, 2006), joint ventures (Inkpen & Currall, 2004), and in the evolution of values and valuation in systems (Farrell, 2007). Even though they arise from different disciplines, the dynamic capability and co-evolutionary theory are analogous in the timing of change that happens simultaneously or congruently.…”
Section: Toward a Process Model Of Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outros pesquisadores têm adotado a teoria da complexidade aliada à teoria da coevolução para estudar aspectos relacionados à gestão estratégica e à gestão da informação (KIM; KAPLAN, 2006, ANDERSON, 1999. Em outro exemplo de aplicação da teoria, Suhomlinova (2006) desenvolveu um modelo coevolucionista de organização-ambiente no qual retrata o impacto conjunto das características do ambiente sobre a sobrevivência da organização e vice-versa. Já Verdu, Gomez-Gras e Martínez-Mateo (2012) aplicaram a teoria da coevolução para estudar a evolução e a sobrevivência das empresas em um cluster de calçados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified