Toward a model of unreliability to study error prevention supports

Vanderhaegen, Frédéric

doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(98)00044-7

Cited by 41 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This aims at reducing the occurrence or the impact of a dissonance. For instance, the control of overloaded situations reduces the occurrence of human errors when tasks are dynamically shared between human and machine (Vanderhaegen 1999c). Knowledge stability relates to sustainable knowledge equilibrium and any deviation from this stability generates dissonances, or is generated by the occurrence of a dissonance or by the impact of its control.…”

Section: Dissonance Control and Knowledge Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?

Vanderhaegen

Carsten

2017

Cogn Tech Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses dissonance engineering and its application to risk analysis of human-machine systems. Dissonance engineering relates to sciences and technologies relevant to dissonances, defined as conflicts between knowledge. The richness of the concept of dissonance is illustrated by a taxonomy that covers a variety of cognitive and organisational dissonances based on different conflict modes and baselines of their analysis. Knowledge control is discussed and related to strategies for accepting or rejecting dissonances. This acceptability process can be justified by a risk analysis of dissonances which takes into account their positive and negative impacts and several assessment criteria. A risk analysis method is presented and discussed along with practical examples of application. The paper then provides key points to motivate the development of risk analysis methods dedicated to dissonances in order to identify the balance between the positive and negative impacts and to improve the design and use of future human-machine system by reinforcing knowledge.

show abstract

Section: Dissonance Control and Knowledge Reinforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?

Vanderhaegen

Carsten

2017

Cogn Tech Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, before introducing an automated system in operational settings, one has to determine sensitive scenarios of unsafe situations, as both humans and machines can be unreliable. Feasibility studies in ATC should at least assess the impact on three elements: operator's workload, safety criteria and perceived unreliability (Vanderhaegen, 1999).…”

Section: Sitmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding and overcoming horizontal separation complexity in air traffic control: an expert/novice comparison

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humans still play a key role in air traffic control but their performances limit the capacity of the airspace and are responsible for delays. At the tactical level, even though Air Traffic Controllers (ATCO) are trained for years, their performances are limited. In this article, we first isolated the tactical horizontal deconfliction task and explained its mathematical complexity. We observed through a simple experiment conducted on

show abstract

“…This control can be solved by applying the principles of Human-Machine cooperation which consist in dynamically sharing tasks between the human operator and an automated system. Tasks are shared at each stage of a decision from the detection to the action (Vanderhaegen, 1999a;Vanderhaegen, 1999b), during a specific task, such as the diagnostic task (Vanderhaegen et al 2004), an air traffic control task (Vanderhaegen, 1999c;Vanderhaegen, 1999d), a knowledge based conflict detection task Vanderhaegen, 2016;Polet et al, 2002;Pacaux-Lemoine et al, 2013), or a driving task (Sentouh et al, 2009;Sentouh et al, 2006;Sentouh et al, 2013;Soualmi eet al, 2014;. The adaptability of the human operator makes it a complex system but essential to the optimal functioning of a Human-Machine System.…”

Section: Identification Of Task Shared (Step 1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of a cooperative eco-driving rail control system: an experimental study

Delfa¹,

Enjalbert²,

Polet³

et al. 2019

Cogn Tech Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

show abstract

Toward a model of unreliability to study error prevention supports

Cited by 41 publications

References 16 publications

Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?

Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems?

Understanding and overcoming horizontal separation complexity in air traffic control: an expert/novice comparison

Design of a cooperative eco-driving rail control system: an experimental study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About