Toward a moral approach to stakeholder management: insights from the inclusion of marginalized stakeholders in the operations of social enterprises

Abstract

PurposePrevious literature on sustainable supply chain management has largely adopted an instrumental view of stakeholder management and has focused on understanding the effect of powerful stakeholders who have a more decisive influence on an organization's supply chain decisions. Social enterprises have emerged as organizations that often aim to create impact by integrating marginalized stakeholders into their operations and supply chains. This study examines the trade-offs that social enterprises experience due to their moral stance toward stakeholder engagement, evidenced in their commitment to serving marginalized stakeholders, as well as the responses adopted to these trade-offs.Design/methodology/approachThe study follows a theory elaboration approach through a multiple case study design. The authors draw on insights from stakeholder theory and use the empirical insights to expand current constructs and relationships in a novel empirical context. Based on an in-depth analysis of primary and secondary qualitative data on ten social enterprises, the authors examine how these organizations integrate marginalized stakeholders into various roles in their operations.FindingsWhen integrating marginalized customers, suppliers and employees, social enterprises face affordability, reliability and efficiency trade-offs. Each trade-off represents conflicts between the organization's needs and the needs of marginalized stakeholders. In response to these trade-offs, social enterprises choose to internalize the costs through slack creation or vertical integration or externalize the costs to stakeholders. The ability to externalize is contingent on the growth orientation of the organization and the presence of like-minded B2B (Business-to-Business) customers. These responses reflect whether organizations accept the trade-offs at the expense of one or more stakeholders or if they avoid the trade-offs and find mutually beneficial solutions.Originality/valueBuilding on the empirical insights, the authors elaborate on stakeholder theory with a focus on the integration of marginalized stakeholders by emphasizing a moral justification for stakeholder engagement, identifying the nature of the underlying trade-offs which can arise when various stakeholder needs are in conflict and examining the contingencies affecting organizational responses to these trade-offs.

How does supply chain transparency influence idiosyncratic risk in newly public firms: the moderating role of firm digitalization

“…Adopting stakeholder theory in supply chain management necessitates a departure from traditional linear communication models towards dynamic, iterative approaches that cater to diverse stakeholder needs (Taylor and Rosca, 2023). Different stakeholders, such as consumers, regulators, shareholders, and suppliers, have distinct informational requirements ranging from environmental sustainability to demand forecasts (Zu and Kaynak, 2012).…”

Unchaining supply chains: Transformative leaps toward regenerating social–ecological systems

“…And how do cultural values, mutual norms, and codes of conduct evolve as supply chain members address their collective dilemmas? The examination of alternative governance models (Gatignon & Capron, 2023; Patala et al, 2022) and the moral determinants (Lazzarini et al, 2020; Taylor & Rosca, 2023) of regenerative efforts represent an important avenue for future research.…”