2013
DOI: 10.1108/s2046-410x(2013)0000001010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a More Contextual, Psychological, and Dynamic Model of Emotional Intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present investigation not only contributes to our understanding of when and how people can adaptively respond to social exclusion (e.g., DeWall, 2010;Gardner et al, 2000Gardner et al, , 2005Lakin, Chartrand, & Arkin, 2008;Mead, Baumeister, Stillman, Rawn, & Vohs, 2011;Wang, Zhu, & Shiv, 2012;Williams & Sommer, 1997), it also answers the recent call for researchers to examine the contextual and motivational factors that influence people's skill at emotional intelligence (see Ybarra et al, 2012Ybarra et al, , 2013. Whereas most prior emotional intelligence research has considered emotional intelligence as a stable, individual-difference construct, in the present research, we demonstrate that people's skill at socially relevant forms of emotional intelligence can vary as a function of their social motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present investigation not only contributes to our understanding of when and how people can adaptively respond to social exclusion (e.g., DeWall, 2010;Gardner et al, 2000Gardner et al, , 2005Lakin, Chartrand, & Arkin, 2008;Mead, Baumeister, Stillman, Rawn, & Vohs, 2011;Wang, Zhu, & Shiv, 2012;Williams & Sommer, 1997), it also answers the recent call for researchers to examine the contextual and motivational factors that influence people's skill at emotional intelligence (see Ybarra et al, 2012Ybarra et al, , 2013. Whereas most prior emotional intelligence research has considered emotional intelligence as a stable, individual-difference construct, in the present research, we demonstrate that people's skill at socially relevant forms of emotional intelligence can vary as a function of their social motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In Study 2, we were interested in exploring the management of others' emotions in the context of a workplace coaching session. A great deal of the research that has explored the social benefits of emotional intelligence has explored these benefits in workplace and leadership contexts (e.g., Niven et al, 2012; for reviews, see Côté, 2014;Ybarra et al, 2012Ybarra et al, , 2013. Indeed, the ability to effectively manage others' emotions is considered to be an important component of effective leadership (for reviews, see Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2014;Humphrey, 2002;Pescosolido, 2002), and skill at managing others' emotions tends to be associated with superior performance in leadership roles and organizational settings (for reviews, see Côté, 2014;Mayer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, these findings expand our knowledge of anger perception and compensation tendencies following customer complaints about a perceived service failure. More generally, and building on burgeoning research on anger intensity (Adam and Brett 2018;Cheshin, Amit, and Van Kleef 2018), our findings highlight the need to continue exploring the consequential influence of emotion at varying intensity on people's perceptions and behaviors in organizational settings (Barsade and Gibson 2007;Elfenbein 2007;Geddes and Callister 2007;Gelfand, Erez, and Aycan 2007;Gibson et al 2009;Miron-Spektor and Rafaeli 2009;Ybarra et al 2013). The cumulative effects of negative customer emotions and behaviors over time (e.g., through repeated service failures; Gregoire et al 2009;Patterson, Brady, and McColl-Kennedy 2016;Surachartkumtonkun, McColl-Kennedy, and Patterson 2015) emphasize the importance of a fuller understanding of the social psychological factors that shape the interpersonal dynamics of negative emotions experienced in service-failure situations.…”
Section: Implications For Theorymentioning
confidence: 82%