Toward a More Usable Home-Based Video Telemedicine System: A Heuristic Evaluation of the Clinician User Interfaces of Home-Based Video Telemedicine Systems

Abstract

BackgroundTelemedicine is the use of technology to provide and support health care when distance separates the clinical service and the patient. Home-based telemedicine systems involve the use of such technology for medical support and care connecting the patient from the comfort of their homes with the clinician. In order for such a system to be used extensively, it is necessary to understand not only the issues faced by the patients in using them but also the clinician.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to conduct a heuristic evaluation of 4 telemedicine software platforms—Doxy.me, Polycom, Vidyo, and VSee—to assess possible problems and limitations that could affect the usability of the system from the clinician’s perspective.MethodsIt was found that 5 experts individually evaluated all four systems using Nielsen’s list of heuristics, classifying the issues based on a severity rating scale.ResultsA total of 46 unique problems were identified by the experts. The heuristics most frequently violated were visibility of system status and Error prevention amounting to 24% (11/46 issues) each. Esthetic and minimalist design was second contributing to 13% (6/46 issues) of the total errors.ConclusionsHeuristic evaluation coupled with a severity rating scale was found to be an effective method for identifying problems with the systems. Prioritization of these problems based on the rating provides a good starting point for resolving the issues affecting these platforms. There is a need for better transparency and a more streamlined approach for how physicians use telemedicine systems. Visibility of the system status and speaking the users’ language are keys for achieving this.

The Association Between Willingness of Frontline Care Providers’ to Adaptively Use Telehealth Technology and Virtual Service Performance in Provider-to-Provider Communication: Quantitative Study

“…First, this study explicitly focuses on care providers’ postadoption behavior using a set of telehealth technologies. Thus far, extensive research has been performed at the intersection of human computer interaction (HCI), health informatics, design science, and information technology (IT) adoption strands, with the main focus on the cognitive/psychological aspect of technology use [21,22] and interactions with technology artifacts [23,24]. For example, prior research noted mechanisms through which individual care providers’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, gratification, and use environment influence adoption intention [25].…”

Family health history collected by virtual conversational agents: An empirical study to investigate the efficacy of this approach

“…Electronic FHx tools are an important way to collect this type of information directly from patients. However, for users to adopt healthcare‐related IT systems, they must allow for efficient and effective interaction (Agnisarman et al, 2017; Agnisarman, Ponathil, Lopes, & Chalil Madathil, 2018; Ponathil, Agnisarman, Khasawneh, Narasimha, & Madathil, 2017). To date, there has been limited research focused on comparing the efficacy and usability of various FHx tool interfaces (i.e., VCA and standard interfaces) (Facio et al, 2010; Owens, Marvin, Gelehrter, Ruffin, & Uhlmann, 2011).…”

Asking the Right Questions—Human Factors Considerations for Telemedicine Design

“… https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics —Developed by interface design and human factors expert Jakob Nielsen, this list of 10 usability heuristics for interface design is helpful rules-of-thumb for identifying major usability issues within an interface design, such as recommendations for the interface to help users identify and recover for errors. Though this list of heuristics is most effective when applied by a usability expert, they can serve as a helpful resource when examining a telemedicine user interface [ 23 ]. …”