2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a multilevel representation of protein molecules: Comparative approaches to the aggregation/folding propensity problem

Abstract: This paper builds upon the fundamental work of Niwa et al. [34], which provides the unique possibility to analyze the relative aggregation/folding propensity of the elements of the entire Escherichia coli (E. coli) proteome in a cell-free standardized microenvironment. The hardness of the problem comes from the superposition between the driving forces of intra-and inter-molecule interactions and it is mirrored by the evidences of shift from folding to aggregation phenotypes by single-point mutations [10]. Here… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This stresses the novelty of our approach with respect to previous single-variable studies [15][16][17]. We discuss the results of the simulations performed on both network models and real networks representing folded proteins [26]. Our results suggest that the proposed analysis framework is useful to investigate the multi-level organization of networks from the perspective of coupling between two different topological features of vertices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stresses the novelty of our approach with respect to previous single-variable studies [15][16][17]. We discuss the results of the simulations performed on both network models and real networks representing folded proteins [26]. Our results suggest that the proposed analysis framework is useful to investigate the multi-level organization of networks from the perspective of coupling between two different topological features of vertices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the literature, such networks are typically called protein contact networks (PCNs). Here we process two sample PCNs (in the following denoted as JW0058 and JW0179) taken from [16,26].…”
Section: Protein Contact Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data representation is obtained by "seriating" the graphs. Therefore, a sequence contains a number of elements equal to the number of vertices in the related graph; see [62] for details on the seriation algorithm. In this case, d I (·, ·) is implemented by using the dynamic time warping algorithm, equipped with a weighted Euclidean distance for computing the distances between the three-dimensional vectors composing the sequences.…”
Section: B Protein Solubility Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first ensemble of graphs contains PCNs, directly obtained from the 3D native structures resolved for the E. coli proteome [36,37]. Each vertex is defined as the alpha carbon of a residue; edges are added among two residues if their Euclidean distance is within the [4,8]Å range.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this paper consists in a two-step generative model for PCNs; the first stage of our method takes inspiration from the work of Bartoli et al [5]. The dataset considered in our study consists of four ensembles (classes) of networks: i) actual PCNs elaborated from the E. coli proteome [36,37], ii) synthetic networks generated according to the recipe of Bartoli et al [5], iii) synthetic modular networks generated with the method proposed by Sah et al [57], and finally iv) those generated with our method. We evaluate the soundness of the proposed approach by focusing on mesoscopic analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%