2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a rodent model of the Iowa gambling task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are currently undertaking neuroimaging studies to bridge the gap between the species. Furthermore, we only studied female subjects, because female human subjects and female rats tend to choose more often long-term disadvantageous options in the IGT than male counterparts (Reavis and Overman, 2001; Van den Bos et al, 2006b, 2007; but see Overman, 2004), leaving only limited opportunity to detect any improvements in IGT performance. Interestingly, in a small pilot study SERT þ/þ and SERT À/À male rats performed the task equally well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We are currently undertaking neuroimaging studies to bridge the gap between the species. Furthermore, we only studied female subjects, because female human subjects and female rats tend to choose more often long-term disadvantageous options in the IGT than male counterparts (Reavis and Overman, 2001; Van den Bos et al, 2006b, 2007; but see Overman, 2004), leaving only limited opportunity to detect any improvements in IGT performance. Interestingly, in a small pilot study SERT þ/þ and SERT À/À male rats performed the task equally well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the rat data to the human data, the difference score was divided by 3. The choices for the empty arms were analyzed as proportion of empty arm visits per block of 10 trials (Van den Bos et al, 2006b). …”
Section: Iowa Gambling Task In Female Sert Knockout Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the cognitive mechanisms required for above-chance performance may not even be exclusive to humans. Van den Bos, Lasthuis, den Heijer, Van der Harst and Spruijt (2006) produced a rodent version of the IGT tested on both mice and rats and found that the participant performance followed a developmental trajectory similar to that of the human participants on the IGT (see also Zeeb, Robbins and Winstanley 2009 for reported results on another recent rat-based IGT variant). Of course, it may be challenged that rather than highlighting the limitations of the IGT as a sufficiently complex cognitive task, the findings say more about the extent to which rat cognitive capabilities are underestimated with respect to humans.…”
Section: The Issue Of Methodological Criticismmentioning
confidence: 89%