2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-071-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Systematic Design for Turbocharged Engine Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…they are centered in low level control of a given subsystem, usually tracking a reference, rather than the engine operation global optimization). Some recent examples may be found in [65,[94][95][96][97].…”
Section: Mils / Silsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…they are centered in low level control of a given subsystem, usually tracking a reference, rather than the engine operation global optimization). Some recent examples may be found in [65,[94][95][96][97].…”
Section: Mils / Silsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One significant problem is that a model may work accurately at a subsystem level, but when coupled with other models, significant deviations may occur because of several closedloop interactions at an engine level [97]. Furthermore, many models are too simple for catching the actual complexity of the system and their prediction capabilities are limited to the identification dataset; this is specially significant in combustion and pollutant formation models [80,96].…”
Section: Mils / Silsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to model-predictive feedback control, where linear models may be used that are valid only around the reference maps [16], the full nonlinear model would have to be considered. Despite the application of custom-tailored algorithms, already the simpler optimisation problems encountered within modelpredictive control are difficult to be solved in realtime due to the limited computational power and memory provided by the ECU [77]. Therefore, an online optimisation is not a feasible option at this time.…”
Section: Engineering Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, only few industrial systems have been developed, e.g. by Honeywell (Stewart et al (2010)) and Hoerbiger (Ängeby et al (2010), for a special application), and both of them based on linear model predictive control, which yields a suboptimal solution, but allows taking explicitly in account bounds on the inputs and constraints on the state or output variables. Nonlinear optimal control has not been considered for long time, mainly because the existing approaches for the solution of the nonlinear optimal control problem are limited to a very small number of cases, and available models hardly fulfill with these conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%