2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijkl.2006.009677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a taxonomy of knowledge-based strategies: early findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge focus of firms in Group B in fact shows a higher motivation toward new knowledge creation independently of its aims (Russ et al 2006). At the same time, however, they put higher emphasis than firms in Group A on all the primary and secondary activities in the knowledge chain whether the aim is to create new knowledge (acquisition and generation) or to utilize existing knowledge (selection and assimilation).…”
Section: Strategy and Knowledge Management Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The knowledge focus of firms in Group B in fact shows a higher motivation toward new knowledge creation independently of its aims (Russ et al 2006). At the same time, however, they put higher emphasis than firms in Group A on all the primary and secondary activities in the knowledge chain whether the aim is to create new knowledge (acquisition and generation) or to utilize existing knowledge (selection and assimilation).…”
Section: Strategy and Knowledge Management Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Strategic and Knowledge management Focus-these sections (each containing eleven questions) aim, respectively, to identify the relevance of specific strategic orientations (e.g., the focus on the continuous improvement of products) (Coda 1988) and knowledge management orientations (e.g., the focus on new knowledge for the launch of new products) (Russ et al 2006); 2. Strategic and Knowledge management Policies Inside-out-These sections (each containing five questions) aim, respectively, to identify the relevance of specific firm resource bases (e.g., the relevance of the financial resources) (Grant 2005) and internal knowledge sources (e.g., the relevance of the entrepreneur for knowledge management) (Bierly and Chakrabarti 1996); 3.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that like XML, RDF can be interpreted by computers as it uses tags as part of a well structured language (St. Laurent, 1999) for data interchange (W3C, 2006). The advantages of obtaining this interoperability are obvious for knowledge reuse (Russ et al, 2006), conceptual navigation and the fusion of knowledge organisation systems (KOS) through multiple domains (W3C, 2006;Zeng and Cahn, 2004;Davies et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Semantic Webmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented represent the continuation and addition to an early analysis [6],that introduced the C 3 EEP (Codification-Tacitness;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The results of that study [6] demonstrated that the KB strategies had a direct and indirect association with organizational outcomes and culture. Earlier research also identified the significant relationship that two (out of the six) KB strategies have with some of the IS technologies studied [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%