1995
DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy

Abstract: In the midst of discussions about improving education, teacher education, equity, and diversity, little has been done to make pedagogy a central area of investigation. This article attempts to challenge notions about the intersection of culture and teaching that rely solely on microanalytic or macroanalytic perspectives. Rather, the article attempts to build on the work done in both of these areas and proposes a culturally relevant theory of education. By raising questions about the location of the researcher … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
2,404
0
78

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,523 publications
(2,497 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
15
2,404
0
78
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors provide authoritative syntheses of organizational change in colleges and universities (Kezar, 2014), which we have not sought to replicate here. Recent works hone the findings of earlier studies by focusing on data use for particular purposes, such as improved teaching, learning assessment, and course design (Hora, Bouwma-Gearhart, & Park, 2017), and refining understanding of the role of shared leadership, college-based teams, and communities of practice in carrying out organizational change efforts (Gehrke & Kezar, 2017;Lester & Kezar, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other authors provide authoritative syntheses of organizational change in colleges and universities (Kezar, 2014), which we have not sought to replicate here. Recent works hone the findings of earlier studies by focusing on data use for particular purposes, such as improved teaching, learning assessment, and course design (Hora, Bouwma-Gearhart, & Park, 2017), and refining understanding of the role of shared leadership, college-based teams, and communities of practice in carrying out organizational change efforts (Gehrke & Kezar, 2017;Lester & Kezar, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to improve understanding of the conditions of data use that support organizational learning about inequitable policies and practices and how to go about changing them. The study contributes to the literature on data use and organizational change (e.g., Bensimon & Hanson, 2012;Bertrand & Marsh, 2015;Coburn & Turner, 2012;Dowd & Tong, 2007;Horn, Kane, & Wilson, 2015;Kezar, 2011Kezar, , 2014Marsh, 2012) by illustrating how local institutional reformers can effectively use and adapt data and data use protocols made available to them through state and national initiatives that include practitioner inquiry as an element of the change process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CRT and CRP are pedagogical tools requisite for teacher candidates in constructing their sense of confidence and cultural competence to teach well in multiethnic settings (Gay 2000;Gay & Kirkland, 2003;Ladson-Billings, 1994, 1995a, 1995bNational Center for Culturally Responsive Teaching, 2004;Townsend, 2002;Villegas & Lucas, 2002). Teacher educators have a responsibility to ensure that teacher candidates are equipped with social justice tools including CRT and CRP (Le Roux, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Construct Of Social Justice Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a politico-educational movement with a traditionally Marxist orientation, the philosophical foundation of critical pedagogy has and continues to be critiqued on the grounds that it is too thinly focused on processes related to 'class struggle'. The critiques against critical pedagogy, especially its theoretical underpinnings, are primarily motivated by the recognition that other factors such as racism, ageism, sexism, cultural imperialism, etc., also contribute to the operations of oppression, and through such recognitions work to keep the field framed by crosscutting radical discourses that promote a multi-sided, culturally plural representational and ideological base for critical pedagogy (Ellsworth, 1989;Ladson-Billings, 1995;Allen, 2002Allen, , 2004Leonardo, 2002;Rossatto et al, 2006). The ongoing project to keep the philosophical foundation of critical pedagogy relevant to contemporary struggles against oppression is, at least in part, an invitation to people concerned about injustice at all levels (local to global), all contexts (personal, community, work, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%