Individual differences in event free recall (episodic memory) and in item generation fluency (semantic memory) were investigated during the course of three studies. The findings suggested that, in addition to two specific factors, an episodic and a semantic factor, performance on both kinds of memory tasks had some dependency on a general factor. A case is made for interpreting all three factors as nonstrategic factors. Kausler (1983) distinguished between rehearsaldependent and rehearsal-independent memory. These two classes of episodic memory may be classified according to the operations occurring during event storage. In rehearsal-dependent memory, events are stored through the aid of an encoding strategy, and the actual memorization operation (laying down of traces in long-term memory) is effortful. Rehearsal-independent memory refers to the traces of events that manage to find their way into long-term memory both effortlessly and without the aid of encoding strategies. The difference between the two classes of memory is confined to encoding, retrieval in both cases being characterized by effortful search. As Hasher and Zacks (1979) pointed out, the vast majority of laboratory research has been concerned with rehearsaldependent or strategic memory. In particular, the rather meager literature devoted to research into individual differences in episodic memory appears to have limited itself to strategic memory tasks. Consequently, it is hardly surprising that such differences have been attributed to effortful acquisition factors (Carroll, 1980).Probably the most extensive investigation of individual differences in episodic memory (Underwood, Boruch, & Malmi, 1978) used a factor-analytical approach set in the framework of an associationistic model. In that study, five episodic memory factors were isolated. Of particular interest here, free recall was found to load on one factor and paired associates and serial recall to load on a second factor. This result led Underwood et al. (1978) to speculate that, although the acquisition phases of free-recall and paired-associate tasks both involve the (presumably effortful) formation of associations, this process requires somewhat different abilities in the two cases. Items in a free-recall list may be acquired through the formation of contextual associations, whereas paired-associates learning presumably involves the formation of associations be- tween the two items in each pair. In both cases, however, the conclusion is that individual differences in memory performance reflect individual differences in the rate at which associations are formed during acquisition, A follow-up study (Malmi, Underwood, & Carroll, 1979) also found free recall and paired associates to load on two different factors, although serial recall changed its allegiance in this study and loaded on the free-recall factor. It should also be noted that the episodic memory measures in both studies tended to correlate with each other, suggesting the existence of a general episodic memory factor, namely, an...