1987
DOI: 10.1126/science.3629243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science

Abstract: A psychological space is established for any set of stimuli by determining metric distances between the stimuli such that the probability that a response learned to any stimulus will generalize to any other is an invariant monotonic function of the distance between them. To a good approximation, this probability of generalization (i) decays exponentially with this distance, and (ii) does so in accordance with one of two metrics, depending on the relation between the dimensions along which the stimuli vary. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

63
2,009
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,158 publications
(2,078 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(14 reference statements)
63
2,009
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This viewpoint makes empirical predictions that are not captured by existing spatial or featurebased theories of similarity, but which have been confirmed [17]. † Shepard's Universal Law of Generalization [18], which implies that items have a probability of confusion that is a negative exponential function of the distance between them in an internal 'space', can be derived from the assumption that the psychological similarity between two objects is a function of the complexity of the simplest…”
Section: Quantifying Simplicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This viewpoint makes empirical predictions that are not captured by existing spatial or featurebased theories of similarity, but which have been confirmed [17]. † Shepard's Universal Law of Generalization [18], which implies that items have a probability of confusion that is a negative exponential function of the distance between them in an internal 'space', can be derived from the assumption that the psychological similarity between two objects is a function of the complexity of the simplest…”
Section: Quantifying Simplicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The similarity measure is typically defined as a decaying exponential function of the distance between the two stimuli, following Shepard (1987). In a prototype model (e.g., Reed, 1972), a category c is represented by a single prototypical instance.…”
Section: Representing Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity between exemplars i and j is an exponential decay function of their distance (Shepard, 1987),…”
Section: Exemplar-generalization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%