Toward Accountability in the Use of the Self‐Esteem Construct

Abstract

Self-esteem is a common target of intervention, and the proliferation of research on self-esteem attests to the widely held belief of its significance as a personality variable. Despite its popularity, there is limited consistency in the use of its definition, and little evidence suggests that counselors routinely assess levels of self-esteem. This indicates a lack of attention to accountability in the quality of counselor services. This article provides a step toward accountability by presenting a review of the evolution of selfesteem as a construct, offering definitions grounded in the professional literature, and discussing a compendium of self-esteem assessments. Working toward consistency and responsibility in defining and assessing self-esteem can positively influence effective self-esteem interventions.

Social Support, Mastery, Self-Esteem and Individual Adjustment among At-Risk Youth

“…In contrast to Rosenberg's scale, these are multidimensional measures. In a review of the development of self-esteem construct, Guindon (2002) presented a compendium of widely used self-esteem assessments, and indicated that the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is considered the standard by which other self-esteem instruments are judged.…”

Market mavens: Psychological influences

“…Self-esteem is a key construct to understanding the underlying psychology behind much of human behavior as is evidenced by the thousands of academic studies that include self-esteem as a focal construct (Guindon, 2002;Rosenberg et al, 1995). Because of the vast literature on the topic, self-esteem has been ascribed several definitions.…”

Emotional barriers to successful reemployment: implications for counselors

“…Learn to assess levels of self-esteem through appropriate self-esteem assessment instruments (see Guindon, 2002;Mruk, 1999).…”