2000
DOI: 10.1080/10669920008720157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an anthropology of democratization in Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to them, the post Iran-Iraq war 'democratic revival' which saw the reemergence of a limited public sphere and the following ascendancy to executive power of Khatami and the reformists, was the demonstration of the effectiveness of such a historical legacy. In reaction to the 'state-centered' perspective, many scholars have proposed the idea of a 'democratisation from below,' the separation between society and the state, and focused on the democratising activities of the Iranian 'civil society,' an expression that became a real key-word in the field (Butel 1998, Khosrokhavar 2000, Saghafi and Ehsani 1999, Kamali 2001, Yaghmayan 2002. In this context, the terms of the debate and the objects of analysis have however been confused with wishful thinking and ideology.…”
Section: Democratisation and Social Secularism In Iran: A Reaction Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to them, the post Iran-Iraq war 'democratic revival' which saw the reemergence of a limited public sphere and the following ascendancy to executive power of Khatami and the reformists, was the demonstration of the effectiveness of such a historical legacy. In reaction to the 'state-centered' perspective, many scholars have proposed the idea of a 'democratisation from below,' the separation between society and the state, and focused on the democratising activities of the Iranian 'civil society,' an expression that became a real key-word in the field (Butel 1998, Khosrokhavar 2000, Saghafi and Ehsani 1999, Kamali 2001, Yaghmayan 2002. In this context, the terms of the debate and the objects of analysis have however been confused with wishful thinking and ideology.…”
Section: Democratisation and Social Secularism In Iran: A Reaction Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the expatriate oppositional press and some books highlight the political repression, violations of women's human rights, the archaic political system of clerical governance, and economic inefficiencies to insist on the impossibility of fundamental reform and change (e.g., Behdad and Rahnema 1995; Abrahamian 1999). 24 Other publications have documented reforms in the political system, economic policy, and foreign policy and progress in the spheres of education and infrastructural development that have occurred since the late 1980s (e.g., Ehteshami 1995;Khosrowkhavar 2000).…”
Section: Fundamentalism the Islamic Republic And Feminismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general argument was that the post-Iran-Iraq war Islamic Republic was democratising, but little consensus existed on who the leading players of such a drive to democratisation actually were. While some scholars argued that change was elite-led (Ansari 2000;Mirsepassi 2011;Abootalebi 2001), others argued that social transformations ushered in political change thanks to the coming of age of a new, post-war youth with a more liberaloriented sensibility (Gheissari and Nasr 2006;Khosrokhavar 1998Khosrokhavar , 2000Hashemi 2010;Butel 1998;Azimi 2008). Some called this generation 'defiant' (Yaghmaian 2002;Khosravi 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%