2001
DOI: 10.2307/3176050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Anthropology of Ethics: Foucault and the Pedagogies of Autopoiesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
43
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(Foucault, 2000b, pp. 255-256) Foucault rejects the possibility that ethics based on duty, rules, or virtues could offer ontological or metaphysical security (Faubion, 2001). Foucault suggests, instead, a sociohistorically contextualized approach offers a more robust way of analyzing how individuals within particular situations come to understand their selves as ethical subjects.…”
Section: Foucauldian Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Foucault, 2000b, pp. 255-256) Foucault rejects the possibility that ethics based on duty, rules, or virtues could offer ontological or metaphysical security (Faubion, 2001). Foucault suggests, instead, a sociohistorically contextualized approach offers a more robust way of analyzing how individuals within particular situations come to understand their selves as ethical subjects.…”
Section: Foucauldian Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is this general discipline-wide assumption, I contend, that has made it difficult for those of us who have attempted an anthropological study of moralities to agree on our subject of study. Related to this is the fact that we have no theoretical or methodological foundation for a systematic approach to the study of local moralities (Faubion, 2001b;Laidlaw, 2002). Because of this, anthropologists of moralities have thus far had to borrow their theories and methods from other anthropological studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much time has been spent discussing our own professional ethics (Asad, 1973;Clifford and Marcus, 1986;Said, 1989;Scheper-Hughes, 1992, outlining the contours of the ethical problems that have come into being alongside recent advances in the biological sciences (Rapp, 1999;Rose, 2006), examining the problems related to translating bioethics cross-culturally (Adams, 2003(Adams, , 2004(Adams, , 2005Stonington and Ratanakul, 2006), and exploring the effects of ethical discourse in contemporary forms of governance (Rose, 1999). More recently, anthropologists have also turned towards idioms of ethics and morality 1 as resources for conceptual tools that might allow us to better describe a series of persistent problems related to the analysis of practical reason, social change, and conflicts over the valuation of incommensurable goods (Boltanski and Thevenot, 2006;Faubion, 2001;Laidlaw, 2002;Lambek, 2000;Robbins, 2004Robbins, , 2007Zigon, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%