1988
DOI: 10.2307/1372644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Economic Understanding of Touch and Concern

Abstract: what men dare do! What men may do! 'What men daily do, not knowing what they do!' t This Article applies established economic concepts to a narrow corner of the law that has caused substantial confusion and resisted coherent explanation. Cf C. CLARK, REAL COVENANTS AND OTHER INTERESTS WHICH "RUN WITH LAND" 208 (2d ed. 1947) (Judge Clark uses the phrase "so narrow a corner of the law"). I thank Henry Manne for some of the basic economic training reflected in this paper. I also thank Judge Richard Posner, and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to one extensive examination of American cases, Stake (1988), the element can be understood as a mechanism for efficiently allocating the burden and the benefit of the promise. If the benefit of the promise is likely to be enjoyed more by the successor than the original promisee, the court will find that the benefit touches and concerns.…”
Section: Touch and Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to one extensive examination of American cases, Stake (1988), the element can be understood as a mechanism for efficiently allocating the burden and the benefit of the promise. If the benefit of the promise is likely to be enjoyed more by the successor than the original promisee, the court will find that the benefit touches and concerns.…”
Section: Touch and Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reichman (1978) defended the touch and concern element on the ground that tying to land the sorts of promises that do not touch and concern to land could reduce efficiency, democracy, or personal freedom. Stake (1988) developed a justification of the touch and concern element that focussed on the asymmetrical costs of rectifying judicial mistakes. The effect of the touch and concern element is to keep promises from running to successors.…”
Section: Touch and Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation