2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an ethics of autopoietic technology: Stress, care, and intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 121 ]. This impacts both biological applications of the autopoietic construction of the Self–world boundary (for evolutionary developmental biology, regenerative medicine, and psychiatry [ 122 , 123 , 124 ]), and the social/personal impact of increasing understanding of what we really are [ 125 , 126 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 121 ]. This impacts both biological applications of the autopoietic construction of the Self–world boundary (for evolutionary developmental biology, regenerative medicine, and psychiatry [ 122 , 123 , 124 ]), and the social/personal impact of increasing understanding of what we really are [ 125 , 126 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, adaptive development and behaviour are driven by perceived mismatch between what-is and what-should-be, making the definition of what-should-be (i.e. goal definition) a fundamental adaptive consideration [70]. On our proposal, it is the prenatal example of foetal buoyancy which constitutes the foundational definition of what-should-be (the 'training data') with respect to antigravity balance.…”
Section: Is 'Uprightness' Fundamental?mentioning
confidence: 96%