2023
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi3192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an increased reliability of chemical bonding assignment in insulating samples by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Grzegorz Greczynski,
Oleksandr Pshyk,
Lars Hultman

Abstract: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra from solid samples are conventionally referenced to the spectrometer Fermi level (FL). While, in the case of metallic samples, alignment of the sample and the spectrometer FLs can be directly verified from the measured Fermi edge position, thus allowing to assess the surface electrical potential, this is not a workable option for insulators. When applied, it generates a large spread in reported binding energy values that often exceed involved chemical shifts. By d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these crystalline nanoflakes on the Y–H zeolite, formed through a hydrothermal dissolution and recrystallization process, are probably X zeolite that shares the same FAU topology as the parent Y zeolite but with a much lower Si/Al ratio close to 1 (Table S1). , However, the nanoflakes formed on the surface of Y-L may contain Al 2 O 3 , as the surface Si/Al ratio is lower than 1 and the binding energy of Al shifts to a lower position (74.6 eV, compared to 75.0 eV in the original Y zeolite) . These results indicate the beneficial effect of adding CTAB that promotes the formation of X zeolite nanoflakes (FAU type) in the synthesis of the Y–H zeolite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these crystalline nanoflakes on the Y–H zeolite, formed through a hydrothermal dissolution and recrystallization process, are probably X zeolite that shares the same FAU topology as the parent Y zeolite but with a much lower Si/Al ratio close to 1 (Table S1). , However, the nanoflakes formed on the surface of Y-L may contain Al 2 O 3 , as the surface Si/Al ratio is lower than 1 and the binding energy of Al shifts to a lower position (74.6 eV, compared to 75.0 eV in the original Y zeolite) . These results indicate the beneficial effect of adding CTAB that promotes the formation of X zeolite nanoflakes (FAU type) in the synthesis of the Y–H zeolite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%