2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03340893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
440
0
79

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
440
0
79
Order By: Relevance
“…Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Fredricks et al, 2004;Jimerson, Campos, & Greif, 2003;Sinclair, Christenson, Lehr, & Anderson, 2003). However, the number and nature of dimensions within this metaconstruct remain unclear.…”
Section: Student Engagement In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Fredricks et al, 2004;Jimerson, Campos, & Greif, 2003;Sinclair, Christenson, Lehr, & Anderson, 2003). However, the number and nature of dimensions within this metaconstruct remain unclear.…”
Section: Student Engagement In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number and nature of dimensions within this metaconstruct remain unclear. Some researchers use a three-part typology and conceptualize it as comprising affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions (Fredricks et al, 2004;Jimerson et al, 2003;Lam et al, 2009), whereas some researchers use a four-part typology and add an academic dimension as well (Appleton, Christenson, Kim, & Reschly, 2006). Some researchers include antecedents of student engagement, such as teacher support and peer relationships, in the measurement of student engagement (e.g., Appleton et al, 2006), whereas others include outcomes, such as grades and discipline (e.g., Archambault, Janosz, Fallu, & Pagani, 2009).…”
Section: Student Engagement In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multidimensional view of the engagement construct (Appleton et al, 2008;Appleton et al, 2006) highlights its complexity as it is often regarded as a meta-construct (Axelson & Flick, 2011;Jimerson et al, 2003;Lam et al, 2012;Sinclair et al, 2003). Specifically, Fredericks et al (2004) identified three dimensions of student engagement that included behavioral, emotional, and cognitive factors; a conceptualization echoed by Marx, et al (2016) in their examination of student course engagement.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subfunção interativa, que representa as necessidades de pertença, amor e filiação (Gouveia, 2013), revelou uma correlação positiva com os fatores de engajamento escolar. Tal fato pode ser justificado pela influência dos afetos e emoções dos estudantes direcionados a instituição de ensino, se estes fatores forem positivos a participação dos alunos na escola, por meio de troca de ideias com colegas e professores em sala de aula e realização das atividades, tende a ser maior do que aqueles detentores de afetos e emoções negativas (Jimerson, Campos, & Greif, 2003). Esse resultado é corroborado também por Hirschi (1969), quepontua que o vínculo com os pais, amigos e funcionários da instituição educacional constituem um bom indicador de apego à escola, principalmente quando todos de seu ciclo o incentiva em suas atividades acadêmicas, refletindo em excelentes resultados escolares.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified