Toward Automated Reduction of Human Errors Based on Cognitive Analysis

Miyamoto, Daisuke; Takahashi, Takeshi

doi:10.1109/imis.2013.147

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 36 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The researcher commented that the cost of risk of wrong judgment by human cost soaring in society. Moreover, Miyamoto and Takahashi (2013) developed an automated reduction of human error based on cognitive analysis. The researchers found out that the root cause of the human error was because of the internal mental process.…”

Section: Human Errors Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Error Reduction Program Through Canonical Action Research (Car) in Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Facility

Saidin

Hasnan

2019

JTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a wafer fabrication manufacturing facility, thousands of wafers are being processed daily. To manufacture the product, the wafers need to go thru hundreds of steps according to the technologies required. The cycle time to complete a standard product ranges from few weeks to few months, depends on the complexity of the technologies. Due to the difficulty and the complexity of the product, Computer Integrated Manufacturing system (CIM), is widely used as a manufacturing platform. As such, all the processes, equipment and wafers are fully integrated. Nevertheless, not all processes could be processed automatically. In the situation of the halfway processes wafer due to equipment or facility interruption, the wafer, need to be processed manually. Engineers or technicians will manually process the affected wafer according to the specification. The problem arises when; there is a human involvement that ends up with wafers misprocess. The potential revenue lost due to wafer misprocess is vast. Hence, this paper aims to discuss issues related to human error in manufacturing, specifically in Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Facility. The paper presents partial input for the Canonical Action Research (CAR) that presently being exercised in order to minimize human error by developing a Small Group Activities (SGA) in the manufacturing facility.

show abstract

Section: Human Errors Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Error Reduction Program Through Canonical Action Research (Car) in Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Facility

Saidin

Hasnan

2019

JTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This includes of any information asset such as computers, password, network, storage, or any source that poses a threat to the organization. Human errors transpire due to the differences in skills, motivations, and knowledge among employees [21]. Human error also arises from work environments that are stressful to the employees, human interface machine issues, and other situational factors [22].…”

Section: A Unintentional Insider's Threat To Organizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitigation Strategies for Unintentional Insider Threats on Information Leaks

Ismail¹,

Yusof²

2018

IJSIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Human error in information security refers to human carelessness such as accidental disclosure of information, loss of data storage, and disposal of data that is not following procedures. Human error also arises due to the differences in skills, motivations, and knowledge between employees (Miyamoto & Takahashi, 2013). It is closely related to the work environment, organisation and job process that influence the behaviour of employees at work (Ganguly, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Classification Of Human Error Factors In Unintentional Insider Threats

Ismail¹

2022

The European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most information security industry reports and works of literature agree that unintentional incidents occur because of human error. This error is one of the major distractions in the information security field. The most challenging in predicting and stopping unintentional insider threats is predicting human errors and human behaviour. This research aims to understand human error taxonomy, closely related to human error factors that pose a high risk of unintentional insider threats. Nine databases were searched using standardised and adapted search syntax to identify the relevant manuscripts published between 2000 and 2019. This paper has identified and classified organisational factors related to human error action. Fiftytwo relevant articles were extracted and analysed. The scoping review outlines human error factors and mapping with human error taxonomy to understand these issues. The identification and classification will help employees and organisations deeply understand the importance of human error taxonomy and human error factors to prevent unintentional insider threats and improve their information security.

show abstract

Toward Automated Reduction of Human Errors Based on Cognitive Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 36 publications

Human Error Reduction Program Through Canonical Action Research (Car) in Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Facility

Human Error Reduction Program Through Canonical Action Research (Car) in Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Facility

Mitigation Strategies for Unintentional Insider Threats on Information Leaks

A Classification Of Human Error Factors In Unintentional Insider Threats

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About