2020
DOI: 10.1080/10686967.2020.1722046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward cost-effective service excellence: Exploring the relationship between managers’ perceptions of quality and the operational efficiency and profitability of restaurants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last two decades, SERVQUAL and DINESERV have been widely used to measure service quality in the hospitality industry [40]. The DINESERV tool was applied to assess managers' perceptions of service quality, and firms' financial reports were used to analyze operational efficiency and profitability [41].…”
Section: Research Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, SERVQUAL and DINESERV have been widely used to measure service quality in the hospitality industry [40]. The DINESERV tool was applied to assess managers' perceptions of service quality, and firms' financial reports were used to analyze operational efficiency and profitability [41].…”
Section: Research Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though few researchers focused on the food quality dimension (Slack et al, 2020), they ignored the interaction quality dimension as proposed by Wu and Mohi (2015). As the operational efficiency of QSRs depends on managerial decisions (Kukanja and Planinc, 2020), the exclusion of internal process management and organizational capacity on these scales is critical, as management coordination and support are essential for employees to deliver enhanced service quality to customers (Mendocilla et al, 2021). To summarize, the research gaps identified are scarce studies on consumer behavior in QSRs from the perspective of only Gen Z consumers; non-availability of service quality scale in QSRs that sufficiently measures real service counter perceptions; ignorance of past researchers to measure operational performance dimension of service quality in QSR settings; and dearth of application and integration of QUICKSERV with consumer behavior models to measure satisfaction, service value and behavioral intentions.…”
Section: Behavioral Intentions Of Gen Z Customers 2351mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2020), they ignored the interaction quality dimension as proposed by Wu and Mohi (2015). As the operational efficiency of QSRs depends on managerial decisions (Kukanja and Planinc, 2020), the exclusion of internal process management and organizational capacity on these scales is critical, as management coordination and support are essential for employees to deliver enhanced service quality to customers (Mendocilla et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inputs Outputs Hruschka (1986) no. of seats, labour costs, cost of goods and materials sold, other operating expenses sales revenue Banker & Morey (1986) performed by Kukanja and Planinc (2020, 2018 and Kukanja (2020, 2019). The authors stressed the necessity of a standardised approach to efficiency measurement and proposed a standardised set of inputs (the requisite assets) and output (sales revenue).…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%