2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward cost-efficient and reliable unit commitment under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
102
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly adopted approaches to address these challenges include advanced forecasting techniques [1][2][3] and improved system operational uncertainty modeling [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Traditionally, the system operators make the commitment and dispatch decisions based on a deterministic renewable point forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Commonly adopted approaches to address these challenges include advanced forecasting techniques [1][2][3] and improved system operational uncertainty modeling [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Traditionally, the system operators make the commitment and dispatch decisions based on a deterministic renewable point forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, many researchers have applied different operational schemes to incorporate stochastic wind power generation [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. These approaches mainly includes deterministic unit commitment (DUC) with dynamic reserves [4][5][6], scenario-based stochastic UC (SUC) [4][5][6][7], intervalbased UC (IUC) [8][9][10], robust UC (RUC) [11][12], chanceconstrained UC [13], as well as hybrid and unified approaches [14] [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A master problem is solved first and a sub problem considering the wind uncertainty is then solved and fed to the master problem. Pandžić et al [41] compared the three methods of stochastic, robust and interval optimization in order to solve the unit commitment problem considering the uncertainties in wind speed. It was found that the stochastic approach gives the more realistic objective value but has a higher computational cost as compared to the other two approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%