2001
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward developing a genome‐wide microsatellite marker set for linkage analysis in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta): Identification of 76 polymorphic markers

Abstract: Linkage analysis can be problematic in humans because of the lack of large, multigenerational pedigrees and the difficulties in obtaining phenotypic data on all family members. In contrast, large, captive colonies of rhesus macaque are a potentially valuable resource for linkage studies because detailed phenotypic and genealogical data are kept, inbreeding is avoided, and DNA samples can usually be obtained. Microsatellite marker sets for genome-wide screening are available in a number of species, but not for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 to 10 mL heparinized peripheral blood by use of the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, California, USA). One-hundred and forty-eight microsatellite markers were selected for this study, including 104 markers reported in rhesus monkeys (Smith et al 2000;Hadfield et al 2001;Andrade et al 2004), 20 markers from the database of the CHLC (Cooperative Human Linkage Center: http://www.gai.nci.nih.gov/CHLC/), and 24 markers reported in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) associated reports of humans (Martin et al 1998;Foissac et al 2000). The primers were selected from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 to 10 mL heparinized peripheral blood by use of the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, California, USA). One-hundred and forty-eight microsatellite markers were selected for this study, including 104 markers reported in rhesus monkeys (Smith et al 2000;Hadfield et al 2001;Andrade et al 2004), 20 markers from the database of the CHLC (Cooperative Human Linkage Center: http://www.gai.nci.nih.gov/CHLC/), and 24 markers reported in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) associated reports of humans (Martin et al 1998;Foissac et al 2000). The primers were selected from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sets of microsatellite markers are available for genome-wide screening or kin selection for some nonhuman primate species (Morin et al 1994a, b;Rogers et al 2000;Hadfield et al 2001;Rogers et al 2006). Because many microsatellite markers on the human genome have already been identified, use of human microsatellite marker information is an efficient means of developing marker sets for other primate species (Domingo et al 1997;Lukas et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of microsatellites have already been described in rhesus monkeys [Hadfield et al, 2001;Kayser et al, 1996;Morin et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2000]. The additional polymorphisms reported here add to this literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Given the value of microsatellites as informative genetic markers, and the intense research interest in rhesus macaques, it is no surprise that various researchers have worked to identify this type of polymorphism in this species [Hadfield et al, 2001;Kayser et al, 1996;Morin et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2000]. However, no one genetic locus is guaranteed to be highly informative in all rhesus monkey populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this way, highly polymorphic microsatellites that were originally designed for humans can also be convenient for primate genotyping [Blanquer-Maumont & CrouauRoy, 1995;Clifford et al, 1999;Clisson et al, 2000]. For example, several human microsatellites have already been used for M. mulatta [Nürnberg et al, 1998;Smith et al, 2000;Hadfield et al, 2001]. However, no microsatellite polymorphisms have been described for M. fascicularis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%