tion. [1] Recently, they have gained significant interest primarily due to their cost-effective approach to fabrication, higher throughput additive manufacturing on mechanically flexible substrates, and spectral tunability comparable to that of conventional inorganic photodiodes. [1][2][3] Along with these exciting features, OPDs have been reported for their potential in a number of applications, including pulse oximeters, [4] biometric analysis systems, [5] retinal prosthesis, [6] wearable electronics, [7] and image sensing. [8] As a result, it has recently gained interest amongst commercial manufacturers as well. [9][10][11] An OPD has similar architecture to an organic photovoltaic device, but operates in reverse bias. While photovoltaic solar cells rely strongly on matching to the incident solar spectrum in order to maximize power conversion efficiencies, the OPD characteristics on the other hand are tailored toward lower dark current (i.e., current measured in the device under null illumination), higher detectivity, and longer linear dynamic range (LDR). The active materials of OPDs commonly include evaporated molecules, solution-processable molecules, and polymers as electron-donating materials. In particular, the semiconducting The field of organic photodiodes (OPDs) has witnessed continuous development in the last decade. Although a considerable portion of electron-donating materials are polymers, there has been an existential gap in deciphering the influence of the polymer's molecular-weight on the photodiode performance. We take up OPDs based on 5,5′-[(9,9-Dioctyl-9H-fluorene-2,7-diyl)bis(2,1,3benzothiadiazole-7,4diylmethylidyne)]bis[3-ethyl-2-thioxo-4-thiazolidinone] (FBR) acceptor material blended with three different molecular-weights of defect-free form of a well-known donor polymer poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) are taken up, and their optoelectronic performance along with morphological characteristics are studied. Disparity of up to a decade in key photodetecting characteristics is observed. Further, the tools of near-edge X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy, resonant soft X-ray scattering spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and time-delayed collection-field measurements are employed to decipher the difference in the fundamental photo-physical processes and the operating mechanisms of the OPDs. It is concluded that the molecular weight and the resulting morphology of the active layer strongly influence photodiode performance, in particular, dark current, linear dynamic range, and specific-detectivity.