Toward Fortress Capitalism: The Restrictive Transformation of Migration and Border Regimes as a Reaction to the Capitalist Multicrisis

Abstract

The article develops the concept of "fortress capitalism." The concept has two dimensions. First, it describes those elements within today's migration and border regimes that aim to control the mobility of the global working class in repressive ways. Second, it designates a dystopian future scenario, in which these repressive elements have massively expanded. Such a formation might develop as part of a twenty-first-century fascism. Based on historical materialism and critical theory, the article makes four points. First, it asserts that migration regimes are being transformed toward a new level of restrictiveness. Second, it argues that fortress capitalism complements theoretical motives that emphasize the uncontrollability of migration. Third, it contends that migration and border regimes in their emergence, dynamics, forms, and effects are closely linked to the intersectional dynamics of global capitalism as a whole. Fourth, it points out that global capitalism fundamentally depends on border regimes to regulate its contradictions. RésuméCet articleélabore le concept de « capitalisme forteresse ». Ce concept comporte deux volets. Premièrement, il décrit leséléments de la migration et des régimes frontaliers actuels visantà contrôler la mobilité de la classe ouvrière mondiale de façon répressive. Deuxièmement, il For helpful comments to this article, including earlier drafts, I am grateful to Lars Bretthauer, Joshua Hatton, Manjiri Palicha, Vishwas Satgar, Simon Noori, Stephan Scheel as well as two anonymous reviewers whose feedback was extremely helpful.

Westphalian Vs. Indigenous Sovereignty: Challenging Colonial Territorial Governance

“…Westphalian sovereignty remains deeply embedded in international relations and law. In this way, Westphalian sovereignty enforces the ongoing colonialisation of populations within states as well as globally (Georgi 2019;Hickey 2020;Van Houtum 2010). Indeed, further research could offer more details on the connection between Westphalian sovereignty and settler colonialism.…”

Urban migrant and refugee solidarity beyond city limits

“…The findings from the study suggest that urban migrant and refugee solidarities are strategically local and transnational in scope to engage both restrictive national and EU policies and global ‘fortress capitalism’ that controls cross-border human ‘mobility and immobility [as] a technique of power’ (Georgi, 2019: 567). In this way, urban migrant and refugee solidarities avoid the ‘local trap’ and refrain from assuming that the local scale is inherently more democratic and more inclusive that other scales (Purcell, 2006).…”

Accommodation for profit, not for refugees: Racial capitalism and the logics of Berlin’s refugee accommodation market

“…Capitalism exploits and marginalizes migrants and refugees as racialized surplus populations in order to maintain profits and power. In this regard, Georgi (2019) establishes the notion of “fortress capitalism” to capture the elements, state, and economic rationales that restrict and control the mobility of refugees, migrants, and the “global working class” for the requirements of labor, or for their (often profitable) fixation, containment, and rejection as “surplus population” in response to the “capitalist multicrisis.” They are made surplus to the requirements of capital and regimes of accumulation, framed as socially undesirable, and unabsorbed by capital (Bhagat, 2022). Therefore, “the ways in which refugees and migrants are governed in Europe is related to their position within contemporary capitalism” (Rajaram, 2018: 627).…”