Toward inclusive science education: University scientists' views of students,instructional practices, and the nature of science

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions and self-reported practices of 18 scientists participating in a yearlong seminar series designed to explore issues of gender and ethnicity in science. Scientists and seminar were part of the Promoting Women and Scientific Literacy project, a curriculum transformation and professional development initiative undertaken by science, science education, and women's studies faculty at their university. Researchers treated participating scientists as critical friends able to bring clarity to and raise questions about conceptions of inclusion in science education. Through questionnaires and semistructured interviews, we explored their (a) rationales for differential student success in undergraduate science education; (b) self-reports of ways they structure, teach, and assess courses to promote inclusion; and (c) views of androcentric and ethnocentric bias in science. Statistical analysis of questionnaires yielded few differences in scientists' views and reported practices by sex or across time. Qualitative analysis of interviews offered insight into how scientists can help address the problem of women and ethnic minorities in science education; constraints encountered in attempts to implement pedagogical and curricular innovations; and areas of consensus and debate across scientists and science studies scholars' descriptions of science. From our findings, we provided recommendations for other professional developers working with scientists to promote excellence and equity in undergraduate science education.

Toward a critical theory of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics doctoral persistence: Critical capital theory

“…For TUS in STEM doctoral programs this lack of a guarantee seems linked to the constantly lurking race-based stereotype threat-being judged or treated by others as conforming to and confirming negative stereotypes related to a race to which an individual self-identifies 7 (S. F. Bancroft et al, 2016;Bianchini, Whitney, Breton, & Hilton-Brown, 2002;Gildersleeve et al, 2011;Ong et al, 2011). Negative stereotyping is a major tool of contemporary racism (Feagin, 2014).…”

Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education

“…McKeown highlighted some of the basic issues and complexities associated with scientists' work with K-12 schools such as their unfamiliarity with curricula, teacher workload demands, the need for developmentally appropriate materials, and the emphasis on testing. Bianchini, Whitney, Breton, and Hilton-Brown (2000) provided recommendations for other professional developers working with scientists to promote excellence and equity in undergraduate science education. Their suggestions included helping scientists think about their own views of science education, as well as looking at institutional and pedagogical constraints to innovations in teaching.…”

Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills

“…A cademic culture in doctoral research universities' STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) programs typically values research activity over teaching (1,2). Faculty commonly believe that research activities enhance teaching quality but disbelieve that teaching similarly enhances research skills (3,4).…”