Toward Integrated and Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Review of Regulatory Frameworks and Institutional Networks

Mardiah, Andri N. R.; Lovett, Jon C.; Evanty, Nukila

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_3

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The implementation of total decentralisation in Indonesia started in 2004, and the Hyogo Framework for Action in 2010 has significantly changed the structure of institutions and legislation, as well as the involvement of non-state actors and international organisations on the DRR programmes' development for local governments in Indonesia (Djalante et al 2012, Mardiah et al 2017. Those alterations also happened as the consequence of the three major laws enacted to respond to the decentralisation in public administration and DRR practices, namely Law No.…”

Section: Local Government Drr Programmes In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AADMER mandated that ASEAN country members implement the agreement at the local level. However, due to Indonesia's weak institutions and lack of institutional capacity (Mardiah et al 2017), there has been reluctance to implement the agreement at the local level (Lassa 2010;Djalante, et al 2012). Out of a total of 497 local governments in Indonesia,323,6 or 65% are categorised as high-risk index on the disaster risk index (BNPB 2016b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Role of Institutional Vulnerability in the Adoption of ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) at Local Level

Syaban

Bisri

2021

Post-Disaster Governance in Southeast Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International agreements on disaster risk reduction (DRR) are a significant reference for disaster-prone countries to ameliorate their DRR programmes with the main objective of creating a disaster resilient community. On the one hand, from the series of international agreements on DRR implemented by the Government of Indonesia, which is one of the world's most disaster-prone countries, the ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) made a significant contribution on DRR efforts in the country. On the other hand, since the effects of disaster are quite localised, local government is the first responder during catastrophic events. This research investigates the institutional vulnerability aspects faced by local governments in Indonesia regarding the implementation process of AADMER. It addresses two central questions: (1) What are the challenges of the implementation of international agreement on DRR at the local level in Indonesia? and (2) What are the institutional vulnerability aspects faced by local governments in Indonesia to implement AADMER? The finding shows that despite Indonesia's national government perceiving AADMER as one of the principal references for the country's DRR programmes, when it comes into implementation at the local level, there is a lack of commitment due to institutional capability issues. The result suggests that institutional capacity, law domestication and the role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) affect the institutional vulnerability aspects of the local government to meet the DRR programme initiated by AADMER.

show abstract

Section: Local Government Drr Programmes In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Institutional Vulnerability in the Adoption of ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) at Local Level

Syaban

Bisri

2021

Post-Disaster Governance in Southeast Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, Indonesia still needs to build a culture of safety, preparedness and resilience through increasing knowledge about disasters and risks and training in preparedness for the community, especially for the most vulnerable to hazards . Another study was conducted by Mardiah, Lovett & Evanty (2017) and found that the progress of DRR in Indonesia is still focused at the national level, it requires some local level efforts, such as strengthening local institutions, increasing community empowerment and adopting approaches that are integrated with the development. has also shown that the president's leadership role, as well as social and political changes, have contributed significantly to the pattern of disaster management.…”

Section: Disaster Management Approach In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergency Response and Communication During Bili-Bili Dam Flood Crisis in Indonesia

Saleh¹,

Yusmanizar²

2019

JKMJC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high rainfall intensity in the South Sulawesi region in January 2019 has increased the water level of the Bili-Bili Dam. It has raised alert status and enforced the Dam manager to carry out emergency responses and open the spillway to anticipate water overflow which has ultimately caused floods in the Gowa Regency area. This study aims to describe and analyze the emergency responses and communications carried out by Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Pompengan Jeneberang (BBWSPJ), as the manager of the Bili-Bili Dam, in dealing with the crisis. The research has applied case study approach, using in-depth interviews and document analysis. The study finds that the emergency responses are carried out based on the Emergency Action Plan and Standard Operational Procedures documents. The responses should involve some related government bodies. There are four levels of hazard status, namely normal, wary, alert, and caution. The higher status would involve the higher government bureaucracy. The study also finds that local people are posited merely as audience or object of the emergency responses. This study proposes that crisis awareness needs to be shared to all stakeholders through developing and implementing appropriate crisis communication planning. Involving locals and stakeholders will provide public understanding about what kind of crisis is happening and what are the right actions should be taken. The role of public relations should be highlighted to increase public trust in the organization's ability to manage the crisis.

show abstract

“…Unsustainable development practices, ecosystem destruction, extreme poverty, and climate change have led to an increase in the frequency and consequences of disasters, whether primarily natural or humancaused. With a paradigm shift from disaster 'government' to disaster 'governance,' the complex problems of both pre-and post-disaster situations should be anticipated and managed in an integrated manner (Mardiah et al 2017). 'Governance' defines as activities to utilize resources, and to formulate coordinated and/or less conflicted policies among involved actors despite the diversity of their original missions and goals (Duit et al 2010; Peters 2013).The U.S. National Academy of Sciences defines resilience as, 'the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, and more successfully adapt to adverse events' (National Research Council, 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sustainable implementation of disaster governance should also be supported by official policies and regulations, provided that development policies clearly internalize the disaster-related agenda, with collaborative resilience at the heart of the process (Mardiah et al 2017). For the regulation to be embedded in society, community-based organizations (CBOs) and local opinion leaders existing prior to and during disasters play strategic roles.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction: Strengthening Post-disaster Governance Platforms Toward Disaster Resilience

Mardiah

Lovett

Olshansky

2021

Post-Disaster Governance in Southeast Asia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most disasters are attributed to natural phenomena, but in many cases, they actually occur or are worsened because of mismanagement and/or the inappropriate implementation of development policy. Unsustainable development practices, ecosystem destruction, extreme poverty, and climate change have led to an increase in the frequency and consequences of disasters, whether primarily natural or humancaused. With a paradigm shift from disaster 'government' to disaster 'governance,' the complex problems of both pre-and post-disaster situations should be anticipated and managed in an integrated manner (Mardiah et al. 2017). 'Governance' defines as activities to utilize resources, and to formulate coordinated and/or less conflicted policies among involved actors despite the diversity of their original missions and goals (Duit et al. 2010; Peters 2013).The U.S. National Academy of Sciences defines resilience as, 'the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, and more successfully adapt to adverse events' (National Research Council, 2012). An important component of this is 'the post-event adaptive processes that facilitate the ability of the social system to reorganize, change, and learn in response to a threat' (Guarnacci 2016, p. 181). Thus, a resilient community will be capable of responding and recovering effectively from disaster (Schwab 2014, p. 21). Resiliency is also interchangeable with

show abstract

Toward Integrated and Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Review of Regulatory Frameworks and Institutional Networks

Cited by 18 publications

References 19 publications

The Role of Institutional Vulnerability in the Adoption of ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) at Local Level

The Role of Institutional Vulnerability in the Adoption of ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) at Local Level

Emergency Response and Communication During Bili-Bili Dam Flood Crisis in Indonesia

Introduction: Strengthening Post-disaster Governance Platforms Toward Disaster Resilience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About