2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.07.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward mechanistic understanding of natural surfactant flooding in enhanced oil recovery processes: The role of salinity, surfactant concentration and rock type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During primary recovery, which uses the natural energy of the reservoir, it is only possible to produce about 5 to 15% of the initial amount of hydrocarbon. Posterior to this step, methods such as water or gas injection are used as an attempt to increase the amount of recovered oil, characterizing the secondary recovery (Daghlian Sofla et al 2016). As a result of the implementation of these operations, still, only 30-50% of the oil present in the reservoir can be removed (Fernandes et al 2016), which require the utilization of enhanced oil recovery techniques (EOR) (Sen 2008;Brown 2010;Khajepour et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During primary recovery, which uses the natural energy of the reservoir, it is only possible to produce about 5 to 15% of the initial amount of hydrocarbon. Posterior to this step, methods such as water or gas injection are used as an attempt to increase the amount of recovered oil, characterizing the secondary recovery (Daghlian Sofla et al 2016). As a result of the implementation of these operations, still, only 30-50% of the oil present in the reservoir can be removed (Fernandes et al 2016), which require the utilization of enhanced oil recovery techniques (EOR) (Sen 2008;Brown 2010;Khajepour et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehghan et al (2015) conducted an experimental study on the application of some surfactant in different conditions of reservoir, types of rocks, reservoir fluids and salinity ranges. They reported that the effect of the used surfactants on IFT reduction was interfered by the 20161-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium dodecyl sulfate IFT influences of the mentioned factors, and optimized when with the optimal salinity level (Daghlian et al 2016). Rodriguez (1992) investigated the amount of surfactant adsorption on the surface of the carbonate rock, and it was identified that the surfactant adsorption was increased with increasing the flowrate at constant surfactant concentration and temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the minimum IFT was 0.07 mN/m and a maximum oil recovery up to 62.1% OOIP were achieved using an anionic surfactant with a concentration of 4000 ppm (Nabipour et al 2017). Additionally, Daghlian et al (2016) investigated the effect of a natural surfactant called Cedar and three common surfactants (CTAB, SDS, and AOS) on IFT reduction. IFT was reduced from 30.1 to about 6 mN/m and ultralow values with increasing oil recovery up to 17% OOIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%