2000
DOI: 10.1002/9780470125915.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward More Accurate Model Intermolecular Potentials for Organic Molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great deal of chemical insight, experimental data and simulation work goes into building the force fields used in molecular modelling, for examples see [9,10,53,305,394] and the references therein. The potential U that appears here is much different than U P that occurs in Schrödinger's equation (which governed the repulsive and attractive interactions of elementary particles).…”
Section: Classical Mechanics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of chemical insight, experimental data and simulation work goes into building the force fields used in molecular modelling, for examples see [9,10,53,305,394] and the references therein. The potential U that appears here is much different than U P that occurs in Schrödinger's equation (which governed the repulsive and attractive interactions of elementary particles).…”
Section: Classical Mechanics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12) Non-bonded interactions are relatively weak and are generally treated as isotropic, although a more realistic interpretation may require the inclusion of anisotropicity in the treatment. 13) Hydrogen bonds, the energies of which are in the range of 1-10 kcal/ mol, are anisotropic and directional.…”
Section: Forces Responsible For Cr Ystal Packingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several force fields that employ distributed multipoles and use explicit polarization (or are QM based using simpliefied MO schemes) have been proposed including AMOEBA, SIBFA, EFP, X-Pol, mDC and NEMO among others [Hermida-Ramón et al (2003); Gresh et al (2007); Ponder et al (2010); Day et al (1996); Xie and Gao (2007); Xie et al (2009); Mills and Popelier (2012); Popelier (2012); Giese et al (2013); Babin et al (2014); Giese et al (2014)]. The use of distributed multipoles results in an improved description of the charge density anisotropy and provides more accurate electrostatic interactions [Stone (2000); Price (1999); Popelier (2000); Kosov and Popelier (2000); Popelier et al (2001a); Popelier and Kosov (2001); McDaniel and Schmidt (2014)]. However, distributed multipoles suffer from one drawback since they cannot describe the overlap of charge density as two molecules get close to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%