2016
DOI: 10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward More Honest Description1

Abstract: This article argues that the convention of archival description has been to hide the variety of shaping processes that lead to the eventual formation of an archival aggregation. It suggests that archivists need to more carefully consider three types of archives shaping: shaping by the archiving I; shaping by other interested parties; and shaping by the archivist. After examining the extent to which such shaping is reflected in a number of archival finding aids created for writers' records, the article suggests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…81 Jennifer Douglas recognized that the conventions of archival theory discourage archivists from preparing descriptions that deviate from the "traditional notions of archives as impartial and natural and of archivists as objective and neutral." 82 Her assessment was made in the context of writers' archives and focused on three different ways in which these fonds can be manipulated: first, by the creator of the archives; next, by the archivist; and finally, by other interested parties. 83 In the context of cartographic materials, this observation is also relevant; as the history of the CLI and CGIS demonstrates, the active parties behind the creation of these materials were using technologies designed to meet the parameters of processes perceived by government as modernization and development toward future prosperity.…”
Section: Colonialism Computerizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Jennifer Douglas recognized that the conventions of archival theory discourage archivists from preparing descriptions that deviate from the "traditional notions of archives as impartial and natural and of archivists as objective and neutral." 82 Her assessment was made in the context of writers' archives and focused on three different ways in which these fonds can be manipulated: first, by the creator of the archives; next, by the archivist; and finally, by other interested parties. 83 In the context of cartographic materials, this observation is also relevant; as the history of the CLI and CGIS demonstrates, the active parties behind the creation of these materials were using technologies designed to meet the parameters of processes perceived by government as modernization and development toward future prosperity.…”
Section: Colonialism Computerizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing so would make clear that "the archives is a construction built by many hands and formed over time. " 38 Honest description would help more fully open male-centered collections, such as military collections, for researchers of women. Using the Pearce Civil War Collection as an example, such a practice would result in finding aids that are attuned to more than just the needs and interests of military scholars.…”
Section: Confronting Archival Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While donor-provided information is likely to be included in finding aids in biographical sketches and scope and content elements, the telling of detailed stories about records is not accommodated in current descriptive standards and these stories are not often shared with users in other forms. 35 Often, stories about records are heard by archivists during the accession stage and may be recorded in some form in an accession record or file; these types of materials are not always -or even often -available to researchers 36 and new accession standards do not include fields that encourage the capture of detailed records stories. 37 The significance that interviewees accorded to donor stories suggests that these require more deliberate care and that archivists should look at developing ways of preserving them where they have consent to do so.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%