Toward People's Cities through Land use and Transport Integration

Abstract

Between 2005 and 2012, India's Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) invested US$20 billion in urban infrastructure and basic services for the urban poor. The transport program under JnNURM is an important advance, helping cities with policies and funding for moving people, not vehicles. Nevertheless, this program has not sufficiently shifted investment in the urban transport sector from road widening and road expansion to sustainable transport. Urban characteristics and transport needs of Indian cities derived from interviews with stakeholders and a literature review are presented. Key improvements for Indian urban transport policy are suggested: (a) reinforce the link between land use and transport to allow preservation of the built environment in existing cities and development of new accessible, dense, and mixed used developments in the fringes; (b) advance the preparation and implementation of comprehensive mobility plans, in close connection with master plans and JnNURM budget allocations; (c) introduce performance measurements of key transport indicators at the citywide level—people served, modal share, travel time, traffic fatalities, and transport tailpipe emissions; and (d) develop capacity-building programs for project planning and delivery at the city level and for evaluation and monitoring at the state and national levels. There is no claim that expansion is not needed, but it should not be the main priority of public investments in the transport sector. Recommendations for India may apply to other rapidly urbanizing and motorizing countries.

Bus Rapid Transit: End of trend in Latin America?

“…As a result, several bus systems confront challenges in planning, implementation, and operation. A review of 13 bus systems in Latin America and Asia (Hidalgo and Carrigan, 2011) indicated that projects brought social, economic, and environmental improvements, but “No project was perfectly executed, due to a combination of institutional, technical, financial and/or politically induced time constraints. Initial implementation was generally rushed, causing operational and user problems. Financial and institutional sustainability was not necessarily assured. Bus Rapid Transit routes were often not fully integrated into the rest of the cities’ public transport system. Many projects faced extensive challenges in accommodating regular city traffic. In cities where BRT services were new, or expanded quickly, public information and user education was poor.” …”

Decision-Making Framework for Prioritizing the Improvement of Pedestrian Facilities in Urban Areas Using Integrated Delphi, AHP, and TOPSIS Approach

“…Despite the difficulties and obstacles, the Indian government has initiated some projects and initiatives aimed at enhancing pedestrian facilities in Indian cities ( 28 – 30 ). The declaration of the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP) by the Indian government in 2006 was a big step forward ( 28 ); it ensured the provision of facilities for non-motorized transport (NMT) in urban areas ( 31 , 32 ).…”

Urban Transport in India: Challenges and Recommendations

“…To give effect to this, the program provided for an outlay of central assistance of more than Rs66,000 crore for the seven-year period, and linked the release of assistance to completion of the reforms. Currently 138 urban transport projects have been approved, with the majority (80 per cent) in Category A cities with populations of at least four million (Hidalgo et al, 2012).…”