Medical Imaging 2022: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography 2022
DOI: 10.1117/12.2607552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward point-of-care breast cancer diagnosis: validation of a spatially tracked automated 3D ultrasound system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system is comprised of a customdesigned 3D-printed wearable base that conforms to patient anatomy, an adjustable compression assembly to stabilize the breast, and a mechanically-driven scanning mechanism. [14] While the system can be adapted to any commercial ultrasound system, for testing purposes, a Canon Aplio i700 US system (Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan) and a high-resolution 14L5 (10 MHz) linear transducer were used. A workstation capable of real-time image acquisition, 3D US reconstruction, multiplanar visualization, and complementary (CBUS) acquisition approach to improve resolution was also developed.…”
Section: System Description and Software Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is comprised of a customdesigned 3D-printed wearable base that conforms to patient anatomy, an adjustable compression assembly to stabilize the breast, and a mechanically-driven scanning mechanism. [14] While the system can be adapted to any commercial ultrasound system, for testing purposes, a Canon Aplio i700 US system (Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan) and a high-resolution 14L5 (10 MHz) linear transducer were used. A workstation capable of real-time image acquisition, 3D US reconstruction, multiplanar visualization, and complementary (CBUS) acquisition approach to improve resolution was also developed.…”
Section: System Description and Software Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] The ability to affix the 3D ABUS scanner directly to the patient mitigates limitations associated with recoding the position of a 3DUS image due to motion and tissue deformations using a previously developed spatially tracked automated 3D US system. [8] Importantly, the 3D ABUS device is more cost-effective, as it is adaptable to any conventional US system and transducer already available in most clinical settings, and is fabricated with economical materials. Image acquisition involves continually acquiring encoded 2DUS images at a fixed spatial interval and reconstructing them in real-time into a 3DUS image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%