1974
DOI: 10.2307/412012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Proto-Elamo-Dravidian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present Brahui population could represent an ancient Indian Dravidian-speaking population relocated to Pakistan, where they admixed with local populations, no historical record supports this hypothesis. Thus, this suggests that they are the last northern survivors of a larger Dravidian-speaking region predating the arrival of Indo-Iranian speakers, thus reinforcing the proto-Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis (McAlpin 1974(McAlpin , 1981.…”
Section: Correlation Of Genes and Languages In The Southwestern Asianmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the present Brahui population could represent an ancient Indian Dravidian-speaking population relocated to Pakistan, where they admixed with local populations, no historical record supports this hypothesis. Thus, this suggests that they are the last northern survivors of a larger Dravidian-speaking region predating the arrival of Indo-Iranian speakers, thus reinforcing the proto-Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis (McAlpin 1974(McAlpin , 1981.…”
Section: Correlation Of Genes and Languages In The Southwestern Asianmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Historical records indicate that the Brahui are descendants of Turko-Iranian tribes from west Asia (Hughes-Buller 1991). Today, Dravidian languages are essentially restricted to south India and Sri Lanka, but the proto-Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis (McAlpin 1974(McAlpin , 1981 proposes that they originated in the Iranian province of Elam and were once spoken over a much larger area, including Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and all India. The Brahui population is characterized by high prevalences (55%) of western Eurasian mtDNAs and the lowest frequency in the region (21%) of haplogroup M*, which otherwise is common (∼60%) among Dravidian-speaking Indian populations.…”
Section: Correlation Of Genes and Languages In The Southwestern Asianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HG 9 (now known as haplogroup E) was found to be largely confined to Iranian, Levantine, North African and southern European (i.e., Mediterranean) populations. Quintani‐Murci et al comment that the clinal variation and haplotypic diversity of this Y‐lineage suggest the spread of farming was accompanied by a major population movement eastward toward the Indus Valley and beyond into the Indian subcontinent—a movement associated with the spread of Dravidian languages (Renfrew, 1996), which many scholars believe formed the basis of the as yet undeciphered Indus script (Fairservis & Southworth, 1989; Gurumurthy, 1999; Mathivanan, 1995; Parpola, 1986, 1994) from a proto‐Elamo‐Dravidian source in southwestern Iran (McAlpin, 1974, 1981). HG 9 coalescence was estimated to be nearly 13,000 BC (Derenko et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le matériel inclus dans cet article reprend une définition relativement large du nostratique, comprenant, outre les six familles incluses dans le dictionnaire d'Illič-Svityč (indo-européen, ouralien, altaïque, dravidien, kartvélien et afroasiatique), d'autres familles pour lesquelles une origine nostratique a été proposée, telles que l'esquimau-aléoutien, le tchouktchi-kamtchatkan, le gilyak ou l'élamite (pour ce dernier, dans la mesure où une proche parenté avec le dravidien a été suggérée, notamment par McAlpin [1974aMcAlpin [ , 1974bMcAlpin [ , 1975McAlpin [ , 1981 et Zvelebil [1974Zvelebil [ et, moins directement, 1999), non seulement par Bomhard & Kerns (1994) et Bomhard (1996), mais également par Dolgopolsky ( ], 1984. Peut-être faut-il de plus rappeler qu'Illič-Svityč lui-même n'excluait pas la parenté éventuelle d'autres familles linguistiques au nostratique que celles retenues dans son dictionnaire, même s'il ne choisit d'y inclure que les familles dont le matériel lui semblait le plus prometteur (Ivanov 1986: 51).…”
unclassified