Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop Land

Abstract

The scientific research literature is reviewed (i) for evidence of how much reduction in nonpoint source pollution can be achieved by installing buffers on crop land, (ii) to summarize important factors that can affect this response, and (iii) to identify remaining major information gaps that limit our ability to make probable estimates. This review is intended to clarify the current scientific foundation of the USDA and similar buffer programs designed in part for water pollution abatement and to highlight important research needs. At this time, research reports are lacking that quantify a change in pollutant amounts (concentration and/or load) in streams or lakes in response to converting portions of cropped land to buffers. Most evidence that such a change should occur is indirect, coming from site-scale studies of individual functions of buffers that act to retain pollutants from runoff: (1) reduce surface runoff from fields, (2) filter surface runoff from fields, (3) filter groundwater runoff from fields, (4) reduce bank erosion, and (5) filter stream water. The term filter is used here to encompass the range of specific processes that act to reduce pollutant amounts in runoff flow. A consensus of experimental research on functions of buffers clearly shows that they can substantially limit sediment runoff from fields, retain sediment and sediment-bound pollutants from surface runoff, and remove nitrate N from groundwater runoff. Less certain is the magnitude of these functions compared to the cultivated crop condition that buffers would replace within the context of buffer installation programs. Other evidence suggests that buffer installation can substantially reduce bank erosion sources of sediment under certain circumstances. Studies have yet to address the degree to which buffer installation can enhance channel processes that remove pollutants from stream flow. Mathematical models offer an alternative way to develop estimates for water quality changes in response to buffer installation. Numerous site conditions and buffer design factors have been identified that can determine the magnitude of each buffer function. Accurate models must be able to account for and integrate these functions and factors over whole watersheds. At this time, only pollutant runoff and surface filtration functions have been modeled to this extent. Capability is increasing as research data is produced, models become more comprehensive, and new techniques provide means to describe variable conditions across watersheds. A great deal of professional judgment is still required to extrapolate current knowledge of buffer functions into broadly accurate estimates of water pollution abatement in response to buffer installation on crop land. Much important research remains to be done to improve this capability. The greatest need is to produce direct quantitative evidence of this response. Such data would confirm the hypothesis and enable direct testing of watershed-scale prediction models as they become available. Further study of individu...

Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality

“…This generally depends on both the capacity of the buffer zone to promote deposition at a given site and the magnitude of the runoff load (Dosskey 2001;Helmers et al 2002). The excellent regression result (R 2 = 0.94) occurred because SF accounts for (Dosskey et al 2006).…”

“…Many field-scale studies have shown buffers can improve water quality, and this literature is well reviewed (e.g., Fennessy and Cronk 1997;Dosskey 2001). Yet at watershed scales, where public concern about water quality is focused, the water quality impacts of conservation practices (such as buffers) are difficult to establish.…”

Managing soil nitrate with cover crops and buffer strips in Sicilian vineyards

“…Buffer strips are vegetated zones adjacent to agroforestry or crop fields that intercept and "treat" the water draining the cropland (Dillahaet al, 1988;Dosskey, 2001). Buffer strips reduce the movement of sediment, nutrients, and pesticides from agricultural lands into the ecosystem (Borinet al, 2010;Borinet al, 2002;Patty et al, 1997;Popov et al, 2005;Rankins et al, 2001;Schmitt et al, 1999;Tingle et al, 1998).…”

Understanding the Behaviour of Contamination Spread in Nagarjuna Sagar Reservoir Using Temporal Landsat Data

“…Contaminants from these sources are both organic or inorganic. Okache et al, (2015), Zhang et al, (2009) and Dosskey, (2001) discussed the adverse effects of these type of contaminants and how uncontrolled contamination results in decline of drinking water quality, human and animal health issues, sedimentation and degradation of aquatic ecosystem. Dauer et al, (2000) emphasizes that land use surrounding the water body influences the type of contaminants contaminating the water body; contaminants coming from industrial outlets and houses are continuous while contaminants from agricultural land use are periodic (Vega et al, 1998); so, understanding the behavior of spread of contaminates in water body will provide insight on what type of contaminants are contaminating the water and their source.…”