(Table 1). Definitive quantitative assays include calibrators fit to a regression model to calculate absolute values and reference standards that are well characterized and fully representative of the endogenous measurand. Definitive quantitative assays can be both accurate and precise. Relative quantitative assays utilize responseconcentration calibration, however in this scenario the reference standards are not fully characterized or truly representative of the endogenous measurand. As such, imprecision can be demonstrated for a relative quantitative method, but accuracy can only be estimated. With quasi-quantitative assays there is a relationship between the response and the measurand but calibration standards are not used. Thus, quasi-quantitative methods can be validated for imprecision, but not accuracy. Qualitative methods generate categorical data. Flow cytometric methods largely fall in the two latter categories and are essentially therefore quasi-quantitative or qualitative.Multi-color flow cytometry is a unique technology, which enables the analysis of heterogeneous cellular systems and provides multiparametric information at a cellby-cell level. The strength of flow cytometry lies not only in the ability to simultaneously measure multiple parameters, but also in the flexibility to report them in different ways. The appropriate data output depends on the biology of the system being investigated, the analytical or scientific question being asked, and the intended use of the results. A wide variety of data outputs can be reported usually expressed in terms of several characteristics of cells, or cell subsets, in the sample tested for example, percentage of positive events, absolute counts, median fluorescence intensity, quantitative antigen expression levels, ratiometric indices, markers coexpression, or relative nucleic acid content.