2016
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2016.2562625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward RCS Magnitude Level Coding for Chipless RFID

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison purposes, Table 1 reports the spectral and spatial capacities, the coding density, and read and frequency ranges of the proposed tag in contrast to other tags available in literature also designed for bistatic systems [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. It is clear from the table that our proposed design outperforms the previously reported results, in terms of space and frequency band efficiencies.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison purposes, Table 1 reports the spectral and spatial capacities, the coding density, and read and frequency ranges of the proposed tag in contrast to other tags available in literature also designed for bistatic systems [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. It is clear from the table that our proposed design outperforms the previously reported results, in terms of space and frequency band efficiencies.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the "zero"and "one"digits are considered as elementary bits in the signature. Each resonance is related to a physical scatterer, and the coding capacity is then associated with the number of resonators existing in the tag and in the allowed frequency band [21]. Therefore, the number of codes can be exponentially increased by simply increasing the number of bits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spectral signature barcodes (as they are usually designated to point out the similarity with optical barcodes) can be of two main types: retransmission based [17], [18] and backscattered based [19], [25] tags. The former consists of a transmission line loaded with resonant elements (or with resonant elements coupled to it) and two cross polarized antennas, one for reception and one for transmission, so that interference between the interrogation signal and the retransmitted encoded signal is minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning chipless RFID tags, the interest in this work, transmission lines loaded with multiple resonant elements, each tuned to a different frequency, have been proposed as multi-resonant frequency domain based tags [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. In such chipless-RFID systems, the interrogation signal is a multi-frequency sweeping signal covering the spectral bandwidth of the resonant elements, and the ID code is inferred from the dips present in the frequency response (retransmission based tags) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] or in the radar cross section response (backscattered tags) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44], caused by the resonant elements. Therefore, the presence or absence of dips at predefined frequencies (each one corresponding to a different bit) is associated with the logic state '1' or '0'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%