2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.1089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Registration of 3D Ultrasound and CT Images of the Spine in Clinical Praxis: Design and Evaluation of a Data Acquisition Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 That would explain why both bias and repeatability of our hierarchical CT-ultrasound registration approach were consistently better on the human dry bone specimen. In ultrasound imaging, a major factor that limits the spatial resolution and visualization of details is the volume of the acoustic pulse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 That would explain why both bias and repeatability of our hierarchical CT-ultrasound registration approach were consistently better on the human dry bone specimen. In ultrasound imaging, a major factor that limits the spatial resolution and visualization of details is the volume of the acoustic pulse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, their method requires subjective selection of tuning parameters and it is not known whether it would work satisfactorily if speckle noise and artifact are severe. 34 We overcome this problem by only extracting those pixels in the vicinity of the posterior surfaces of a vertebra and assigning the gray value of the rest of ultrasound pixels to zero. It is worth mentioning that the extracted pixels are by no means an accurate representation of the posterior vertebral surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of this model is that only two parameters, namely the slope m and the intercept of angular value q c , are required to control the amount of bending. Therefore, to conform to different parts of the navigation channel, the joint values Δq are modeled and adjusted by the two variables (m, q c ) according to (10) Assuming the robot is in a straight configuration when , we can derive the end-effector position l x eff ∈ ℜ 3 relative to the link frame given by Δq e as follows: (11) The corresponding displacement of the end-effector can then be expressed as follows: (12) With m = 0 and a small value ±ε assigned to q c , we have (13) Fig. 4(b) shows that the two resultant configurations are bending in opposite directions.…”
Section: ) Characterization Of Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasound images are subsequently registered to the CT images so that the patient anatomies in the ultrasound can be matched to those in the CT image. Several groups have investigated ultrasound-CT registration of bone structures at different anatomical regions, such as the femurs [21][22][23][24][25], the pelvis [23,24,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], or the vertebrae [27,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For live human subjects, given that the vertebral column is a region of the utmost importance, it would be unethical to implant fiducials in patient vertebrae purely for research purposes. In a more recent study, Winter et al [43] developed an ultrasound acquisition protocol using actual patient images. The proposed ground truth employed for validation was generated by running through 50 cycles of the same registration technique being validated, effectively generating quantitative results that demonstrate the precision of the registration technique instead of its accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%