2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward reporting standards for the pathogenicity of variant combinations involved in multilocus/oligogenic diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenotypically, only the son has anosmia, cleft lip and palate. Although our study might be criticised for possibility of FGFR1 monogenic disease model with coincidental presence of the identified PROKR2 variant in the patient or a lack of functional analysis of these mutations in vitro and in silico, 25 the identification of this additional mutation in PROKR2 raises intriguing questions regarding its role as a modifier gene and its potential contribution to the distinct phenotypic manifestations of KS and nCHH within the same family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Phenotypically, only the son has anosmia, cleft lip and palate. Although our study might be criticised for possibility of FGFR1 monogenic disease model with coincidental presence of the identified PROKR2 variant in the patient or a lack of functional analysis of these mutations in vitro and in silico, 25 the identification of this additional mutation in PROKR2 raises intriguing questions regarding its role as a modifier gene and its potential contribution to the distinct phenotypic manifestations of KS and nCHH within the same family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This does not diminish the usefulness of existing monogenic approaches, but rather highlights not only the need to design tools specifically for this task, but also the importance of scoring pathogenicity of variant combinations using method trained on oligogenic disease cases. Indeed, variants involved in oligogenic combinations have been shown to have different characteristics than variants involved in monogenic diseases, such as higher MAF and lower monogenic pathogenicity scores for both digenic and modifier variants ( Gazzo et al 2017 , Versbraegen et al 2019 , Papadimitriou et al 2023 ). Hop also introduces a new method to score the disease-relevance of gene pairs, combining the scores of the RWR algorithm to obtain a gene-pair proximity score to a set of disease-related seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the constructed feature representation of the model and the limited amount of higher-order oligogenic cases involving more genes with confident pathogenic evidence that are currently present in OLIDA [ 44 ], VarCoPP2.0 remains constrained to the prediction of bilocus variant combinations. However, the ORVAL platform [ 13 ], where VarCoPP2.0 is integrated, allows for the exploration of oligogenic networks that may involve more than two genes, by linking gene pairs containing predicted pathogenic variant combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%