When the editors of this special issue started their scientific careers, they embarked on the analysis of a topic that promised to be policy relevant. Neither industry nor governments, however, shared this view. Though socioeconomic metabolism had a long tradition in interdisciplinary sciences and was a fascinating endeavor, it was not clear whether it would gain currency in policy making or would ever guide business decisions. Perhaps it was a risk to engage in such a topic. Today, socioeconomic metabolism research has gained in prominence in the science and policy communities and has been a "rising conceptual star" (Fischer-Kowalski 1997) in guiding research and policy formulation. This is, in hindsight, no surprise.Global demand for primary materials has grown massively since the 1970s and has been accelerating since the year 2000 at a time when the global economy has faltered and population growth has slowed. Global material use is now, in 2015, reaching 80 billion tonnes per year (Schandl et al. 2015). The global system of production and consumption is geared to a very large and annually growing throughput of biomass, fossil fuels, metal ores, and construction materials. It shows considerable inertia toward achieving decoupling of economic activity, human well-being, and natural resource use in the short term. The infrastructure that underpins the provision of energy, water, food, housing, and mobility needs to be built up in developing countries and replaced in industrialized countries quickly in order to allow for human well-being while reducing emissions.