Toward the identification of mechanisms to ensure effective university-industry collaboration in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Purpose This study aims at advancing the understanding of University-Industry Collaboration (UIC) by proposing an adapted conceptual model for comprehensive contextual analysis taking industry perspective and identifying effective mechanisms for stimulating UIC in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Design/methodology/approach This study was designed as a multicase qualitative study. Data were collected through interviews of focus groups representing 26 agro-processing companies operating in Rwanda. The process consisted of two sessions evaluating the current collaboration patterns, and two sessions identifying the desired future and the mechanisms to realize it. Data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software with the grounded theory techniques. Findings Findings indicate that current interactions are unidirectional and focus on educational collaboration. Results are short-term and do not yield sufficient benefit for the companies involved. Industry aspirations for future collaboration were identified, along with linkages between inputs, activities and outcomes. Research limitations/implications This study has two noteworthy limitations. First, this study did not consider the capacity of firms to collaborate. Second, for simplification purposes, this study did not integrate other complementary sources of knowledge for firms. To overcome these omissions, a short introduction of University–Industry Collaboration (UIC) was presented to participants highlighting and justifying the scope of the study. As research implications, this paper presents a new integrated conceptual framework, which can be useful for studies focusing on a comprehensive analysis of the UIC context and identifying effective mechanisms for improvement in the future. A construct of policies that stimulate UIC is proposed, thereby facilitating further operationalization and testing of context-specific hypotheses on policy stimuli. Practical implications In practice, the identified conceptual framework allows to holistically capture and reflect on the interrelationships between UIC factors and outcomes for a specific context, hence, informing better UIC decision-making. In this way, this paper advances the operationalization of the argument for reconciling organizational theories with their practices. Social implications This paper presents a systemic means for organizational theories to perform their adaptive role in society. Indeed, as demonstrated by the empirical results, the proposed framework is effective not only in systematically assessing the current situation, but also in predicting the desired state in the future. In other words, the proposed framework facilitates prescience theorizing, which is a mechanism for ensuring that organizational theories adapt to future requirements of the society. Originality/value This study develops a new integrative conceptual framework to accommodate the interaction between UIC’s institutional decision-making and existing macrolevel frameworks of innovation ecosystems. In terms of methodology, the value of this study lies in its adoption of an ex ante approach to the development of mechanisms to stimulate UIC. This use of prescience theory (Corley and Gioia, 2011) constitutes an important – but long-neglected – approach to UIC and its adaptive role in society.

Practice-Based Views on Key Success Elements in University-Industry Collaborative Activities

“…Cheah et al (2023) proposed a structural framework and guiding principles to integrate academic and practitioner resources and expertise as an effective mechanism for social business success. Nsanzumuhire et al (2023) developed an integrative conceptual framework for comprehensive analysis of the university-industry collaboration context, identifying effective mechanisms for improvement. Palmieri et al (2023) presented a joint university-business research process that enables innovation processes.…”

Editorial: Human capital, management and economics during and after the COVID-19 outbreak

“…These practices develop a positive job-fit perception among faculty members, which eventually leads to positive job performance. Secondly, Nsanzumuhire et al's (2023) holistic model covering the macro level factors show that certain factors such as work commitment, inter-organisational trust, effective governance and orientation towards university-industry collaboration on the part of both the industry and the academia could provide a sound basis for developing a mechanism for university-industry collaboration. Finally, a key takeaway from Sham et al (2023) is that there is great potential in cryptocurrency adoption in terms of new means of money and revenue generation, and there are certain factors that could encourage consumers to adopt cryptocurrencies.…”

“…In the fourth article, Nsanzumuhire et al (2023) seek to explore the underlying mechanisms through which university-industry collaboration (UIC) can be enhanced. The authors argue that university-industry partnerships in the sub-Saharan African (SSA) region are weak due to inadequate theoretical frameworks and practice mechanisms for university–industry collaborations.…”