Toward the micro and macro-level consequences of interactional justice in                 cross-cultural joint ventures

Lu, Yadong

doi:10.1177/0018726706068769

Cited by 41 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 69 publications

(90 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, many researchers have focused on interactional justice as a single construct even after findings indicated that a two-factor solution should be adopted (e.g., George & Zhou, 2007;Luo, 2006Luo, , 2007. We believe that the apparent contradiction between our findings and those which obtained separate factors is primarily due to contextual differences which give rise to the halo effect.…”

Section: Implications For Theory and Researchcontrasting

confidence: 75%

“…Colquitt's (2001) and Colquitt et al's (2001) view that interactional justice should be regarded as encompassing two factors is by no means universal in the current justice literature. Among the studies that have continued to reference interactional justice as a single construct those by Erdogan, Liden, and Kraimer (2006), George and Zhou (2007), and Luo (2006Luo ( , 2007.…”

Section: Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interpersonal Aspects of Justice in Relationships Between Consumers and Service Providers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a controversy in the justice literature as to whether interpersonal aspects of justice are best represented as one construct (interactional justice) or two (interpersonal justice and informational justice). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we tested competing models of these constructs on a sample of healthcare consumers (n = 1919) with respect to their justice judgments of primary care physicians. We found that the single factor model (interactional justice) represented a better fit to the data. Our results do not necessarily contradict those of prior studies that have found a better fit for a bi-dimensional model in organizational settings, however. Instead, we are suggesting a contingency approach: the results may be due in part to the halo effect, which may manifest itself where consumers are unfamiliar with the service provider and with the complexities of that person's role.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Theory and Researchcontrasting

confidence: 75%

Section: Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpersonal Aspects of Justice in Relationships Between Consumers and Service Providers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is focused on aspects of fairness related to interpersonal issues and information exchange in social context (Colquitt, 2001;Ariño & Ring, 2010), although it relates to the openness of communication among supply chain partners (Luo, 2007). Openness relates to greater sensitivity in managing conflict and disparities (Lu, 2006). Narasimhan et al (2013) found that justice is important for improving supply chain relationship performance and that each category of justice has unique contributions and an important part to play in supply chain relationships.…”

Section: The Relationship Between Supply Chain Justice Dimensions Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

The synergistic and complementary effects of supply chain justice and integration practices on supply chain performance: A conceptual framework and research propositions

Ziaullah

Feng

Akhter

2015

SAJEMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, firms have been using their supply chain integration (SCI) as a competitive weapon in the intensive, globalised competitive arena. The contingent perspective in supply chain management maintains that it is necessary to observe the interaction between SCI practices and supply chain justice. A critical issue to be resolved is whether this fit leads to synergistic and complementary effects on supply chain performance. In order to contribute to this research problem, we analysed supply chain justice instances in order to determine the importance of supply chain justice, as well as highlights complementary role in SCI and its influences on supply chain performance. A conceptual framework has been developed and five propositions established to verify the contents of a theoretical study. Accordingly, balancing the adoption of SCI practices and supply chain justice will lead to the generation of greater benefits relative to the effect of both independent driving forces on supply chain performance. Furthermore, the proposed framework has been analysed in order to examine its applicability in the South African context. The study thereby suggests the empirical research guidelines and the paper concludes with a discussion of future research.

show abstract

“…Y. Luo (2006) studied firms from Europe, North America, and Asia Oceania making Chinese investments. Honesty and transparency (interactional justice) were found to buffer effects of cultural distance on trust and decision effectiveness for boundary-spanning executives and their Chinese partners at the microlevel and attachment between IJV partners at the macrolevel.…”

Section: Performance-related Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exchanging Social Information Across Cultural Boundaries

Ravlin

Ward

Thomas

2014

Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social information exchange (SIE) in organizations has long been an area of interest for management scholars; however, in recent years, this literature has become fragmented and widely dispersed. As communication and transfer of information increasingly occur between individuals and aggregates of widely varying national and regional cultures, a reconsideration and review of the topic is appropriate, including identification of key issues in this research domain and an integration and synthesis of what we currently know about SIE across cultural boundaries.We examine the last 13 years of cross-cultural SIE research at the country, organization and subunit, team and dyad, and individual levels; provide a basic analytic framework; and provide propositions and direction to guide future research. Our review notes key findings based on three general topics in the literature: (1) antecedents to SIE, (2) process and relational outcomes of SIE, and (3) performance outcomes of SIE. We conclude that this area of research would benefit from increased focus on the nature of the relationship between the exchange partners, the broader social context in which exchanges are embedded, consideration of the capabilities of the actors and their task requirements, and timing of events. Issues regarding SIE quality and fidelity, motivations, cultural distance, and uncertainty are discussed. These research directions can potentially enhance diverse literatures, such as interpersonal interactions, team decision making, knowledge transfer, and corporate governance.

show abstract

Toward the micro and macro-level consequences of interactional justice in cross-cultural joint ventures

Cited by 41 publications

References 69 publications

Interpersonal Aspects of Justice in Relationships Between Consumers and Service Providers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Interpersonal Aspects of Justice in Relationships Between Consumers and Service Providers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

The synergistic and complementary effects of supply chain justice and integration practices on supply chain performance: A conceptual framework and research propositions

Exchanging Social Information Across Cultural Boundaries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About